Tell your friends

TELL YOUR FRIENDS

POPULAR SEARCHES

List of Shows


The Young and the Restless - MESSAGE BOARDS

Soaps Boards :: The Young and the Restless Forum :: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out

Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.

The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out

Started by terriesingz at 2009/11/04 04:47AM
Latest post: 2009/11/05 03:09PM, Views: 819, Replies: 39
« 1 2 3 » »| page:
#11   2009/11/04 09:31AM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
bear13
image

I don't think viewers are whining about Sharon and Nick's baby, Its wrong
no matter how you look at it. Sharon and Nick already lost Cassey. I think
the writers switched the baby to keep Phillis and Nick together because
if Faith would of been with Sharon like she should have, her and Nick would
still be together. Faith is Nick and Sharon's daughter and i pray that she will
know her real parents before she's a teenager.

#12   2009/11/04 08:06PM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
lvsdasnow
image

Quote terriesingz:I'm also a professional marketer/advertising exec., and make my living that way.
I noticed on the board that a lot of viewers are going on and on about them giving Sharon the baby back. It's my opinion as a veteran soap viewer and professonal marketing person, that the more we voice our distaste, the longer it is going to play out. Even though the comments are negative, it still shows the writers that you are interested in the story. It's kind of like watching a train wreck, you can't look away. Although you hate the story, it keeps you glued to the tv and showing your interest, even in a negative way, will keep the story dragging on. After all, the writers have to please the advertisers, and they have to show that they are providing stories that viewers watch, even ones they hate.
The writers aren't really writing to make us happy, they are writing to maintain and increase viewership to maintain and increase advertising!
They likely have a marketing department monitoring message boards to get viewer feedback, without asking/paying for it. Great marketing tool.

-------------------------------------------------------
excellant Post.
Just to answer a few questions. Each and every show of every kind has someone taking notes. When more viewers are watching and rates go up, they take notes as to what is keeping the viewers interest up.
How they know when someone is watching (or the DVD or VCR is recording) is when the power meters indicate the power source leaving their instruments. Like watching the electric meter at your home when someone turns on the light. The meter speeds up. Same thing happens with the TV's or Radio shows.
The faster the meter, the more people are watching or listening. Rates go up. When the switch is turned off, the meters slow down showing less interest in what ever is playing.
To survive, the rates have to stay up. When they fall, something has to change. The more talk about a subject, the higher the interest rate. Turning off the set, VCR, and DVD DOES make a difference.
There were large numbers saying they were leaving Y&R when Victor left. That was a big threat and no one could not take that chance.
I work in Sales and this is how I determine when to put products up for sale. Times of year also make the difference in rates. When another store has a sale, and a product is a hit, you better believe I will out do that sale with a sale of my own of that kind. When one show finds out another show has a hit with a s/l, then that same hit will make it ways to another airway.
It is Called Survival.

#13   2009/11/05 06:19AM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
juskickit
image

I can see the logic behind the madness, but doesn't mean that I have to like it. You could see the story coming a mile away and Adam seems to be like a rat that can fit into any crevice and tote off a block of cheese without being noticed. Pick on the adults, not children - and especially babies when their younger years are to be forged and bonded with their REAL parents (except if they were given up for adoption for the greater good of the child). This baby switch couldn't have happened to the two most NON DESERVING actresses on this show. For Sharon to think that she & Nick have lost 3 daughters is unconscionable. How does Adam keep lurking, snooping, conniving, scheming - and keeps getting away with murder and mayhem. I don't care what the ratings say - I delete what's on my DVR if it's crap. This is crap. I read the spoilers and if I don't like it - I just delete it, I have other things that need to be done in my house vice wasting 45 mins of my day. There is no way that Ashley couldn't tell she did or didn't have a baby. I've had four, you are sore downstairs (maybe even an episiotomy), you bleed for nearly two months, your boobs are bursting with milk. Then, what Ashley "all of a sudden" remembers nearly hitting Nikki, but doesn't remember stupid ADUMB in a purple dress causing her to fall down the staircase & asking him why would he do this to her??? And that there's soooo much blood...... HELLLLLLOOOOO????? The public are not idiots. Y&R will begin to lose a bunch of faithful watchers. Bring on more believable and tactful storylines.

Modified 2 times(s), last time at: 2009/11/05 06:23AM
#14   2009/11/05 12:05PM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
Pinchy
image

You know I read these posts all the time and I'm amazed at the number of people that are upset about this s/l and Adam. I talk to my friends/co-workers and family about the show all the time and don't get the same reaction. They all take it in stride, accept it's a soap opera and it will change soon. No one I talk too cares that much or has boycotted. Even when Victor was leaving they were ok, he's old time to go, bring on some new people.
I come on here though and you'd think the sky was falling half the time. I don't think the writers and producers take alot of stock on what they read here as most of it is negative anyways. There is a difference between complaining and constructive criticism.

#15   2009/11/05 12:21PM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
countryMomof4
image

I respectfully disagree Pinchy. It's not just the message boards but the emails that viewers have sent in as well. If the writers DON'T pay attention to us, they will make the same mistakes over and over with the storylines. Because they tape about a month in advance, we can't change things overnight. But if we say nothing, then we get nothing/crap.

#16   2009/11/05 12:32PM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
YandRlover298
image

I started watching the young and the restless when i was 6, I watched it every afternoon with my mom when i got home from school. My mom started watching the show when it first aired with my grandmother. So it's kind of a family thing. Nick and Sharon have always been my favorite couple (although colleen and Jt came a close 2nd). I've now been a Y &R fan for 15 years.

I can honestly say that since the writers have killed CC's character off the show and taken away another child from Nick and Sharon, I haven't watched the show since.

#17   2009/11/05 12:35PM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
Gencor
image

I find a huge difference when I don't read these boards and when I do. The boards tell a different story from the storyline itself. What I read and what I see are very different. When ou watch you then get the whole picture, not just the written words. The fans seem to want to influence the writers instead of letting the writers just tell their story. This is a soap opera not written by the fans, but the writers themselves. I have been guilty of accusing the writers, many times, of not getting their facts straight or of not writing the show the way I would like to see it play out, but I have to remind myself that I watch it because I like it, I really have no interest in writing it or trying to sway the writers in writing it for me. Everyday brings on a new drama, a new story. Frankly, I wouldn't want the writers to write the show the way I would want them to. It is a soap opera and the writers are telling a story. They are writing it. It is like a new chapter everyday to a book. I can't say that I want to rush the baby back to Sharon because I am too interested to see why they want to play this out, just as I am for the other storylines as well. I figure if you like the show you will watch it and if you don't, then you will stop and someone else will watch in your place. It is a story that they are telling, I don't feel that I should be telling them how to write it because I am too interested in watching to see what is coming next.

#18   2009/11/05 12:45PM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
countryMomof4
image

The only time I want to influence the writers is when a storyline is just waaay too outrageous or totally disgusting. I have written emails about different plotlines expressing my disappointment but I have also sent in emails praising the writing as well. Feedback is a good thing.

#19   2009/11/05 12:52PM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
Soulsistah
image

Different strokes for different folks. The reason I think so many people have been complaining about this show is because they really DO care about this show, especially long-time viewers, and the show is no where near the quality - in any respect, that it once was (pre-LML). There are many, many message boards out there with tons of really good critical analyses of what viewers find wrong with the writing and why. This is the information, I would think, the show's "lurkers" would find most helpful as to what fans like and dislike about the show. Polls are a very, very miniscule piece of that feedback, the most unreliable, however, for the reasons Suegerry pointed out upthread. MBs, on the other hand, can't be manipulated and reflect a much broader range of what online fans think about all storylines - not just the select questions chosen by the websites/soap magazines from month to month. I'm sure there are many, many posters here on this board, for example, that do not vote in online polls on any regular basis, if at all,but post their opinions on characters, storylines, etc. on a much more regular basis.

Re the effect of viewers complaints, well, anyone watching this show must know from past history how complaints - via MBs (in recent years), letters, e-mails, phone calls and even poll questions have proven to be VERY effective at getting storylines changed. A perfect example would be the story of Neil and Victoria. Long-time viewers know exactly what happened to that storyline and why: Fan protest pure and simple. It's been commented on by previous writers of the show in interviews/articles that overwhelming viewer protest and anger is what nixed that storyline. We've seen certain "potential" storylines in recent years get nixed as well (Phyllis and Adam, for example), the Tyra and Ana story, the departure of David Chow, and others. Why? Fan protest. Did fan protest and the real threat the show would lose many viewers if EB didn't come back influence negotiations? I'm betting it did. Don't ever underestimate the power of the consumer/viewer because it's a two-way street: the writers write what they want, but if fans aren't watching the show, they lose their jobs (see Lynn Marie Latham's history on this show as HW for an excellent example . Any signficant drop in ratings is a big deal for CBS/Sony and they watch the trends over a period of time to gauge whether overall fans are tuning in, or out. I'm betting the Adam kidnapping of Sharon's baby will wrap much sooner than the writers initially planned because of the overwhelming viewer protest (even the Soap mags are commenting on how much this storyline is hated).

MB buzz about the show - pro or con- is not the same thing as watching the show. Heck, I haven't watched the show in months and I do not need to because I know what's going on - not every detail, but part of the reason I stopped watching in the first place is because, like many other viewers, I found the overall quality of the show and the storylines stunk and I won't waste my time watching garbage and so don't really care about many of the current s/ls and characters (the Scooby Gang anyone? ) . Does that mean I won't or can't participate in MBs or discussions? Of course not because the characters, storylines I'm interested in are the ones I follow on MBs updates (and some are much better than actually watching!) and can comment based on that. By not watching, viewers send TPTB a very strong message that they won't be able to ignore for very long because the only thing that matters to Sony/CBS is the numbers, i.e. ratings. Having a lot of people buzzing on the boards, but not actually watching/recording the show isn't good enough, and if things continue the way they have been, something will change. I'm betting it'll be the writing team. $ talks and it's well known the numbers for the show are noticeably down, compared to last year, and have been for months now. LML's tenure as HW and EP had higher ratings for Y&R in general than the current HWs and EPs. Yet where is LML now?

Modified 3 times(s), last time at: 2009/11/05 01:22PM
#20   2009/11/05 12:55PM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
Gencor
image

Quote countryMomof4: The only time I want to influence the writers is when a storyline is just waaay too outrageous or totally disgusting. I have written emails about different plotlines expressing my disappointment but I have also sent in emails praising the writing as well. Feedback is a good thing.


I agree with you. I think that feedback is always a good thing. I just don't think that it should be to influence the storylines. I would much perfer to just "read the book", so to speak. To me, watching the soaps is like reading a book that just never ends. That is why I stay entertained. If it is chapter that I would prefer not to read, I just skip it until the next chapter brings up something that I might like better.

#21   2009/11/05 12:57PM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
countryMomof4
image

LOVE your post soul!!!!! Extremely well thought out and expressed.

#22   2009/11/05 01:00PM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
Debrajo
image

Quote Soulsistah: Different strokes for different folks. The reason I think so many people have been complaining about this show is because the really DO care about this show, as long-time viewers, and the show is no where near the quality - in any respect, that it once was. There are many, many message boards out there with tons of critical analysis of what viewers find wrong with the writing and why. This is the information, I would think, the show's "lurkers" would find most helpful as to what fans like and dislike about the show. Polls are a very, very minute piece of that feedback, the most unreliable for the reasons Suegerry pointed out upthread. MBs, on the other hand, can't be manipulated and reflect a much broader range of what online fans think about all storylines - not just the select questions chosen by the websites/soap magazines from month to month.

Re the effect of viewers complaints, well, anyone watching this show must know from past history how complaints - via MBs (in recent years), letters, e-mails and even poll questions have proven to be VERY effective at getting storylines changed. A perfect example would be the story of Neil and Victoria? Long-time viewers know exactly what happened to that storyline and why: Fan protest pure and simple. It's been commented on by previous writers of the show in interviews/articles that overwhelming viewer protest and anger is what nixed that storyline. We've seen certain "potential" storylines in recent years get nixed as well (Phyllis and Adam, for example) and others. Why? Fan protest. Did fan protest and the real threat the show would lose many viewers if EB didn't come back influence negotiations? I'm betting it did. Don't ever underestimate the power of the consumer/viewer because it's a two-way street: the writers write what they want, but if fans aren't watching the show, they lose their jobs (see Lynn Marie Latham's history on this show as HW for an excellent example .

MB buzz about the show - pro or con- is not the same thing as watching the show. Heck, I haven't watched the show in months and I do not need to because I know what's going on - not every detail, but part of the reason I stopped watching is because, like many other viewers, the overall quality of the show and the storylines stunk and I won't waste my time watching garbage. Does that mean I won't or can't participate in MBs or discussions? Of course not because the characters, storylines I'm interested in are the ones I follow on MBs updates (and some are much better than actually watching!) and can comment based on that. The only thing that matters to Sony/CBS is the numbers, i.e. ratings. Having a lot of people buzzing on the boards, but not actually watching/recording the show isn't good enough, and if things continue the way they have been, something will change. I'm betting it'll be the writing team. $ talks and it's well known the numbers for the show are noticeably down, compared to last year, and have been for months now.


Soul,I have to agree with evry thing you said.Very good post.

#23   2009/11/05 01:03PM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
Gencor
image

Quote Soulsistah: Different strokes for different folks. The reason I think so many people have been complaining about this show is because the really DO care about this show, as long-time viewers, and the show is no where near the quality - in any respect, that it once was. There are many, many message boards out there with tons of critical analysis of what viewers find wrong with the writing and why. This is the information, I would think, the show's "lurkers" would find most helpful as to what fans like and dislike about the show. Polls are a very, very minute piece of that feedback, the most unreliable for the reasons Suegerry pointed out upthread. MBs, on the other hand, can't be manipulated and reflect a much broader range of what online fans think about all storylines - not just the select questions chosen by the websites/soap magazines from month to month.

Re the effect of viewers complaints, well, anyone watching this show must know from past history how complaints - via MBs (in recent years), letters, e-mails and even poll questions have proven to be VERY effective at getting storylines changed. A perfect example would be the story of Neil and Victoria? Long-time viewers know exactly what happened to that storyline and why: Fan protest pure and simple. It's been commented on by previous writers of the show in interviews/articles that overwhelming viewer protest and anger is what nixed that storyline. We've seen certain "potential" storylines in recent years get nixed as well (Phyllis and Adam, for example) and others. Why? Fan protest. Did fan protest and the real threat the show would lose many viewers if EB didn't come back influence negotiations? I'm betting it did. Don't ever underestimate the power of the consumer/viewer because it's a two-way street: the writers write what they want, but if fans aren't watching the show, they lose their jobs (see Lynn Marie Latham's history on this show as HW for an excellent example .

MB buzz about the show - pro or con- is not the same thing as watching the show. Heck, I haven't watched the show in months and I do not need to because I know what's going on - not every detail, but part of the reason I stopped watching is because, like many other viewers, the overall quality of the show and the storylines stunk and I won't waste my time watching garbage. Does that mean I won't or can't participate in MBs or discussions? Of course not because the characters, storylines I'm interested in are the ones I follow on MBs updates (and some are much better than actually watching!) and can comment based on that. The only thing that matters to Sony/CBS is the numbers, i.e. ratings. Having a lot of people buzzing on the boards, but not actually watching/recording the show isn't good enough, and if things continue the way they have been, something will change. I'm betting it'll be the writing team. $ talks and it's well known the numbers for the show are noticeably down, compared to last year, and have been for months now.


It is funny that you mention Latham. The numbers were much higher when she was writing for the show. I liked her style of writing for the most part and I wish that she would come back. She was a much more progressive writer and the characters were much more interesting. The backward trend of this Bell writer and her team, along with the trashing of the characters has just really been a disappointment.

#24   2009/11/05 01:17PM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
Soulsistah
image

Yes, during LML tenure the overall ratings, on a month to month basis were higher than they've been, on average, compared to the current writing teams. BUT those numbers were still down compared to the previous writing regime(s) and that's what caused so many to lombast LML's writing - she ignored character history completely and changed the direction of the show too much. Many viewers who tuned out were the long-time viewers who've supported the show for decades, and the studio/Sony finally took notice and did something about it (and I won't even get into how much many of the vet actors did NOT like LML's changes on and off the script pages ).

My main point is, regardless of what HW is in place, when the numbers keep going down for the show, it doesn't matter if 10 million people are talking and blogging about the show online if they are NOT WATCHING the show. The ratings drop during the past 11 months is irrefutable evidence of that. And that's all Sony cares about - $, via ad dollars. So viewer protest about characters/storylines DO make a difference because the writers know that too many unhappy viewers = more dropped ratings (see Guiding Light as the latest poster child of what happens when too many viewers tune out over time).

Modified 1 times(s), last time at: 2009/11/05 01:19PM
#25   2009/11/05 01:22PM
Re: The more we whine about Sharon/baby, the longer it will play out
Demus
image

Quote countryMomof4: Yes suegerry! Why go to Crimson Lights when you could go to Timmie's?


I vote for a Dunkin' Donuts!!!

Back On Topic:
Where would the message boards be if we the viewers/bloggers/posters didn't "whine"? They get their ideas from all of us for sure! Hope they take heed to our concerns too!

« 1 2 3 » »| page:

Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.

« Go back to topic list