Tell your friends

TELL YOUR FRIENDS

POPULAR SEARCHES

List of Shows


The Young and the Restless - MESSAGE BOARDS

Soaps Boards :: The Young and the Restless Forum :: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?

Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.

What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?

Started by shademorgis at 2009/11/03 01:40PM
Latest post: 2009/11/12 11:42AM, Views: 1522, Replies: 78
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 » »| page:
#11   2009/11/03 04:23PM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
Debrajo
image

Quote lightandday: What gives Nick the right, Hummmmm lets see he's a DAM NEWMAN! Period. A Newman can be wrong,right,true or false, Just urks me to no end.


Ain't that the truth?And yes it irks me too.

#12   2009/11/03 04:28PM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
Debrajo
image

Quote Moniker1979:
Quote Debrajo:
Quote countryMomof4:
Quote clicquot1:
Quote shademorgis: Cliquot1-You are exactly right. Nick only knows SOME of the stuff Adam has pulled. He does not trust Adam and that is justifiable, but why does he not realize that HE is married to a psycho. Yes, Adam is nuts, but so is Phyllis, just because her evil deeds were done years ago does not make them any more excusable. Maybe Sharon didn't want Noah around Phyllis, but was forced to deal with it. I see double standards here and it isn't right on Nicks part. And in no way am I endorsing Adam or his psycho antics. But Nick does not know everything about Adam yet. He's plain jealous. Can't wait for ALL the truths about Adam AND Phyllis to come out. I have been waiting for Phyllis to get her just desserts for years.

LMAO! Me too, SHADEMORGIS been waiting YEARS for that! Oh, well I still say ADAM & PHYLLIS are two of a KIND and one day (soon, hopefully) they can just sssssssssslither off together somewhere!


I certainly agree with this. Phyllis had pulled some major PUBLIC stunts and still Sharon did not use that excuse to keep Noah away from her. Double standards for sure. Nick is using Noah as an excuse. IF Phyllis' crimes can be overlooked( forgiven) then why can't Adam's? WE know he stole the baby but no one else does other than Dr. Taylor.


Because Nick never even gave a thought to Noah.His thoughts were all about the love of his life.He never even once mentioned Noah.That idea of protecting him from Adam was put in to his head by his wife who was only trying to justify his reasons to go talk to Sharon.She had to create excuses and reassure her self that yes,this was the reason why he was really going to his beautiful ex wife's house.To warn her and Noah about scary Adam.


Exactly!

However, the point at issue is does Nick have any right to be angry or to dictate to Adam and Sharon. NO! He chose to renew his vows, which means he has absolutely no say in whom Sharon does or does't see. It's none of his damn business. Period.

I don't buy that he's just trying to protect her. Nick can be a major jerk and as much as I loathe Adam, he has no right to dictate for Adam to stop seeing Sharon and vice versa. Adam was right when he said that Sharon is not his wife anymore and therefore not his concern.

I don't understand why some accept Nick's "concern" and then point the finger at Sharon again. She's done nothing, except tell Nick to leave her alone. Yet, Nick keeps coming to see her at her house and same with Adam. I think both of them just need to stay far away from her.


Moniker I agree with every thing you said.Sharon has not even left her house to see either of these men.They show up at her door with out even calling.She has told Nick to leave her alone.I don't understand how she gets the blame time after time for what Nick does and now Adam.I wish the writers would keep both of them away from her.

#13   2009/11/03 04:31PM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
clicquot1
image

Quote Debrajo:
Quote Moniker1979:
Quote Debrajo:
Quote countryMomof4:
Quote clicquot1:
Quote shademorgis: Cliquot1-You are exactly right. Nick only knows SOME of the stuff Adam has pulled. He does not trust Adam and that is justifiable, but why does he not realize that HE is married to a psycho. Yes, Adam is nuts, but so is Phyllis, just because her evil deeds were done years ago does not make them any more excusable. Maybe Sharon didn't want Noah around Phyllis, but was forced to deal with it. I see double standards here and it isn't right on Nicks part. And in no way am I endorsing Adam or his psycho antics. But Nick does not know everything about Adam yet. He's plain jealous. Can't wait for ALL the truths about Adam AND Phyllis to come out. I have been waiting for Phyllis to get her just desserts for years.

LMAO! Me too, SHADEMORGIS been waiting YEARS for that! Oh, well I still say ADAM & PHYLLIS are two of a KIND and one day (soon, hopefully) they can just sssssssssslither off together somewhere!


I certainly agree with this. Phyllis had pulled some major PUBLIC stunts and still Sharon did not use that excuse to keep Noah away from her. Double standards for sure. Nick is using Noah as an excuse. IF Phyllis' crimes can be overlooked( forgiven) then why can't Adam's? WE know he stole the baby but no one else does other than Dr. Taylor.


Because Nick never even gave a thought to Noah.His thoughts were all about the love of his life.He never even once mentioned Noah.That idea of protecting him from Adam was put in to his head by his wife who was only trying to justify his reasons to go talk to Sharon.She had to create excuses and reassure her self that yes,this was the reason why he was really going to his beautiful ex wife's house.To warn her and Noah about scary Adam.


Exactly!

However, the point at issue is does Nick have any right to be angry or to dictate to Adam and Sharon. NO! He chose to renew his vows, which means he has absolutely no say in whom Sharon does or does't see. It's none of his damn business. Period.

I don't buy that he's just trying to protect her. Nick can be a major jerk and as much as I loathe Adam, he has no right to dictate for Adam to stop seeing Sharon and vice versa. Adam was right when he said that Sharon is not his wife anymore and therefore not his concern.

I don't understand why some accept Nick's "concern" and then point the finger at Sharon again. She's done nothing, except tell Nick to leave her alone. Yet, Nick keeps coming to see her at her house and same with Adam. I think both of them just need to stay far away from her.


Moniker I agree with every thing you said.Sharon has not even left her house to see either of these men.They show up at her door with out even calling.She has told Nick to leave her alone.I don't understand how she gets the blame time after time for what Nick does and now Adam.I wish the writers would keep both of them away from her.

Well, can't blame ole NICK after he re-re-committed to the SECOND WIFE!

#14   2009/11/03 04:36PM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
countryMomof4
image

Just like it was Sharon's fault when she was at the cabin. Men kept dropping by to see if she was alright. They weren't invited either and I don't think it's because she can't handle things alone. Men just can't leave HER alone.

#15   2009/11/03 04:48PM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
Debrajo
image

Quote countryMomof4: Just like it was Sharon's fault when she was at the cabin. Men kept dropping by to see if she was alright. They weren't invited either and I don't think it's because she can't handle things alone. Men just can't leave HER alone.


Well she is drop dead gorgeous.And I think a man would have to be blind to not be attracted to her beauty.Heck Adam is half blind(not making fun of his affliction,my aunt is blind)and he is crazy about her.They just swarm around her like bees to honey.She doesn't have to do a thing.

#16   2009/11/03 05:10PM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
Moniker1979
image

Quote Debrajo:
Quote Moniker1979:
Quote Debrajo:
Quote countryMomof4:
Quote clicquot1:
Quote shademorgis: Cliquot1-You are exactly right. Nick only knows SOME of the stuff Adam has pulled. He does not trust Adam and that is justifiable, but why does he not realize that HE is married to a psycho. Yes, Adam is nuts, but so is Phyllis, just because her evil deeds were done years ago does not make them any more excusable. Maybe Sharon didn't want Noah around Phyllis, but was forced to deal with it. I see double standards here and it isn't right on Nicks part. And in no way am I endorsing Adam or his psycho antics. But Nick does not know everything about Adam yet. He's plain jealous. Can't wait for ALL the truths about Adam AND Phyllis to come out. I have been waiting for Phyllis to get her just desserts for years.

LMAO! Me too, SHADEMORGIS been waiting YEARS for that! Oh, well I still say ADAM & PHYLLIS are two of a KIND and one day (soon, hopefully) they can just sssssssssslither off together somewhere!


I certainly agree with this. Phyllis had pulled some major PUBLIC stunts and still Sharon did not use that excuse to keep Noah away from her. Double standards for sure. Nick is using Noah as an excuse. IF Phyllis' crimes can be overlooked( forgiven) then why can't Adam's? WE know he stole the baby but no one else does other than Dr. Taylor.


Because Nick never even gave a thought to Noah.His thoughts were all about the love of his life.He never even once mentioned Noah.That idea of protecting him from Adam was put in to his head by his wife who was only trying to justify his reasons to go talk to Sharon.She had to create excuses and reassure her self that yes,this was the reason why he was really going to his beautiful ex wife's house.To warn her and Noah about scary Adam.


Exactly!

However, the point at issue is does Nick have any right to be angry or to dictate to Adam and Sharon. NO! He chose to renew his vows, which means he has absolutely no say in whom Sharon does or does't see. It's none of his damn business. Period.

I don't buy that he's just trying to protect her. Nick can be a major jerk and as much as I loathe Adam, he has no right to dictate for Adam to stop seeing Sharon and vice versa. Adam was right when he said that Sharon is not his wife anymore and therefore not his concern.

I don't understand why some accept Nick's "concern" and then point the finger at Sharon again. She's done nothing, except tell Nick to leave her alone. Yet, Nick keeps coming to see her at her house and same with Adam. I think both of them just need to stay far away from her.


Moniker I agree with every thing you said.Sharon has not even left her house to see either of these men.They show up at her door with out even calling.She has told Nick to leave her alone.I don't understand how she gets the blame time after time for what Nick does and now Adam.I wish the writers would keep both of them away from her.


Well, that's all I'm saying. Why blame her for something she can't help? She doesn't even step out of her house and she swarmed by Nick and Adam. These are big boys, they make their own decisions. If Nick chooses to obsess about Sharon and Adam, then obviously he is not being a very considerate husband. He should just stay away from Sharon alltogether and let her be. But, as usual, he can't help himself.

#17   2009/11/03 08:32PM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
dumbfairiesgirl
image

He reminds me of Ethan off of Passions he was in love with two woman. He wants to stay married to his wife but doesn't want his ex to move on. Sound familiar? The only different is that Phyllis is acting like she is no longer threatened about Shick and their history together.

#18   2009/11/04 04:22AM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
Chrisdee
image

What bothers me about this is that Phyllis actually blackmailed Sharon - but Nick didn't think she was a bad influence on Noah! Huh? Well, okay Nick! Makes sense to me....not!

Sure Adam is a louse. We all know that. But Nick has no right to dictate who Sharon can and cannot see. Noah is a young adult and not an impressionable little boy (like he was when Phyllis became his stepmother). It all boils down to the Newman sense of entitlement. What's theirs is always theirs, even if they've decided they don't want it any more.

#19   2009/11/04 04:28AM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
Debrajo
image

Quote Chrisdee: What bothers me about this is that Phyllis actually blackmailed Sharon - but Nick didn't think she was a bad influence on Noah! Huh? Well, okay Nick! Makes sense to me....not!

Sure Adam is a louse. We all know that. But Nick has no right to dictate who Sharon can and cannot see. Noah is a young adult and not an impressionable little boy (like he was when Phyllis became his stepmother). It all boils down to the Newman sense of entitlement. What's theirs is always theirs, even if they've decided they don't want it any more.


That is why Nick is so angry.He has no control over Sharon and he knows that she has moved on and left him with his second choice.Sharon is out from under his thumb and not fighting over him any more.It's that fragile male ego thing.And the Newman men suffer worse with it than any other men

Phick and Shick are only to be discussed in the designated thread. Jade

Modified 1 times(s), last time at: 2009/11/04 04:33AM
#20   2009/11/04 04:40AM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
Chrisdee
image

Sorry, I honestly didn't think I was discussing Shick and Phick. The point I was trying to make is that Nick does not have a right to be angry about Sharon and Adam. It was definitely not meant as a slam or as a call out to the Shick/Phick camps. Obviously I overstepped the mark.

#21   2009/11/04 04:46AM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
Debrajo
image

Quote Chrisdee: Sorry, I honestly didn't think I was discussing Shick and Phick. The point I was trying to make is that Nick does not have a right to be angry about Sharon and Adam. It was definitely not meant as a slam or as a call out to the Shick/Phick camps. Obviously I overstepped the mark.


Me too.Sorry about that.

#22   2009/11/04 04:58AM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
mdtuttle
image

Quote shademorgis: I know Adam is a psycho, but ANYONE other than Nick should warn Sharon. Sharon didn't like it either when Nick dumped her for a psycho (Phyllis), but she was forced to deal with it. DEAL with Adam liking Sharon NICK.


I'm sort of on the fence of this one. On the one hand I agree with you. Nick has no buisness sticking his nose in Sharon's buisness. He certianly does not have the right to tell Sharon who she should or should not be involved with.

The other side of that is Nick still cares about Sharon and always will, as many exes care for the person they had children with but are no longer with. He does not want to see her get hurt and he is aware of a lot of the garbage (not all) that Adam has pulled. HE doesn't want to see Sharon get hurt and he knows Adam's track record.

I was the first to say Nick should stay away from Sharon and concentrate on his marrige, but I can understand his wanting to Warn her away from Adam.

#23   2009/11/04 05:23AM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
Debrajo
image

Quote mdtuttle:
Quote shademorgis: I know Adam is a psycho, but ANYONE other than Nick should warn Sharon. Sharon didn't like it either when Nick dumped her for a psycho (Phyllis), but she was forced to deal with it. DEAL with Adam liking Sharon NICK.


I'm sort of on the fence of this one. On the one hand I agree with you. Nick has no buisness sticking his nose in Sharon's buisness. He certianly does not have the right to tell Sharon who she should or should not be involved with.

The other side of that is Nick still cares about Sharon and always will, as many exes care for the person they had children with but are no longer with. He does not want to see her get hurt and he is aware of a lot of the garbage (not all) that Adam has pulled. HE doesn't want to see Sharon get hurt and he knows Adam's track record.

I was the first to say Nick should stay away from Sharon and concentrate on his marrige, but I can understand his wanting to Warn her away from Adam.


MD I can sort of agree with what you are saying.The problem that I have is I have seen that look so many times on Nick's face when it comes to Sharon and another man.He seemed fine the first time he was there but it was day time and there was no cozy fire,wine glasses etc.like this time so he had no reason to be jealous.But you could see the jealousy in his eyes Halloween night when he was taking that room in and it was plain old jealousy of his ex wife and his brother.Nick is human and that is a normal reaction for any one.He has always acted like this when he sees Sharon with another man but seeing his hated brother with her only intensifies those feelings.I think to a certain extent he could be worried about her and Adam but I still believe that the underlying reason is that he is jealous of his brother and Sharon and is using the excuse that Adam has ulterior motives and he has to keep him away from her.I can see both reasons here.But I still don't believe that Sharon should get the blame for his running to her house and trying to tell her who she can and can not see.

#24   2009/11/04 05:27AM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
suegerry
image

I see this as being all about Nick's love for Sharon and a soon to be reunion.

Sharon befriending Adam is who she is, a kind person,. who sees good in people. She has no idea nor does Nick of Adam's evil deeds and when they do it will be what it should have been their little girl with them and Noah in a pretty house.

#25   2009/11/04 05:48AM
Re: What gives Nick the right to be angry about Adam and Sharon?
Debrajo
image

Quote suegerry: I see this as being all about Nick's love for Sharon and a soon to be reunion.

Sharon befriending Adam is who she is, a kind person,. who sees good in people. She has no idea nor does Nick of Adam's evil deeds and when they do it will be what it should have been their little girl with them and Noah in a pretty house.


Sue,that's what I think,too.That's why it is ridiculous for Nick to be saying all those things about Adam when he knows nothing about the extent of Adam's crimes.He and all of G.C. will be shocked to find out all the evil things Adam has done.But right now neither Nick or Sharon know this.So as I said the writers are stretching here to try to give Nick a legitimate excuse to be so very upset with the love of his life being friends with his brother.Totally ridiculous.

« 1 2 3 4 5 6 » »| page:

Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.

« Go back to topic list