|
|
Soaps Boards :: The Young and the Restless Forum :: mary janes next target will be after sharon and her unborn baby
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
reeny![]() |
i guess Sharon better watch her back cos Mary Jane is around the corner.i hope she does not hurt her baby. please |
dumbfairiesgirl![]() |
Well it seems to be that if MJ was going to do that Summer and when she sees Jack and Sharon together. Then who to said that Sharon is not going to be the target. I mean Phyllis baby got hurt because Jack recently slept with Phyllis and their connection. Now Shack together is going to sent MJ over the edge. I pretty sure that MJ doesn't care. |
MadelynB![]() |
Even as crazy as MJ is — she already knows that Sharon is a threat to her. That's why she has a picture of her in her "enemies book". It's Jack that MJ is interested in and she saw Sharon run back to Jack and tell him that he was the father of her unborn child. Plus, MJ knows that Jack still cares for Sharon and wants to be with her. Even as cunning and crazy as MJ is, it would seem that she would still be able to put two and two together and realize that her most immediate threat is Sharon — not Phyllis. Maybe she thinks that Phyllis would want Jack over Nick but she should know better than this! Looks like this could be where she slips up. |
yrnub![]() |
I think you are right. I think Sharon and her baby are the new target. I pray the writers don't use this as an excuse to lose the baby. |
kattsbark![]() |
She is another nut case that does not deserve to breed |
clicquot1![]() |
Quote kattsbark: She is another nut case that does not deserve to breed That is a TERRIBLE thing to say even about a ficticious character. |
905misty![]() |
Quote clicquot1: Quote kattsbark: She is another nut case that does not deserve to breed That is a TERRIBLE thing to say even about a ficticious character. Unfortunately, reality is that there are some people in this world that should never have children. A crazy self-centered, vindictive, cat-murdering, child endangering woman would definitely qualify as someone that shouldn't be breeding. |
jen loves y ...![]() |
There is no way that Sharon will lose this baby. The writers already took a baby from her a few years ago, and it nearly destroyed Nick and Sharon then... then they took Cassie and we all know what happened there. Something good has to happen to Nick and Sharon. Please! Used to love their beyond happy story line! |
ILuvNY![]() |
Quote jen loves y and r: There is no way that Sharon will lose this baby. The writers already took a baby from her a few years ago, and it nearly destroyed Nick and Sharon then... then they took Cassie and we all know what happened there. Something good has to happen to Nick and Sharon. Please! Used to love their beyond happy story line! I also think that it would be a cruel thing to do to Sharon Case, since she lost a child a few months back. |
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.