|
|
Soaps Boards :: General Hospital Forum :: JASON Fans ONLY Thread
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
meowbowow![]() |
Quote genhospchat For me the leech sucking the life out of Jason has ALWAYS been Carly. *I don't see leech as a bad thing because it's no different than calling someone a mooch or a thief or a coward (which can ALL be used in this instance as a substitute word for leech) So....... For me in this context leech is an adjective (describing something/someone) not a noun (person, place or thing). Either way, what difference does it make? No rules were broken, no one's names were changed (going by the rule used as a defense) and no actual names were even mentioned...so...?? * Gen, how DARE you call Carly a leech. Oh right you didn't, you made a reference DESCRIBING the way she acts. Gee isn't it funny no one got up in arms for you saying that about CARLY. Fancy that!! |
JASONandLIZf...![]() |
well i will.. i love carly.. lw is awesome. i dont find her that way at all.. her character is a little out there yes |
GHVixen![]() |
Quote genhospchat: Quote meowbowow: Quote genhospchat Oh I'll bet his CD's are all alphabetical too! LMAO, probably. I bet he fold and arranges his socks and underwear a certain way in his drawers too, or asks his wife to do it!! Jason isn't married and hasn't been for about 7 years. But he and Sam will be married soon. EEEEEEEEEE, I can NOT wait!!!!!! |
GHVixen![]() |
Quote meowbowow: Quote esprit I agree Gen ... I miss romance on GH! sigh.. Ditto, and this current "couple" ain't cutting it for me. Missing Liason!! Well, not all couples are going to please everyone....just like liason definitely didn't cut it for me and probably, most of the fans. |
GHVixen![]() |
Quote esprit: Quote generalhospital2012: Quote esprit: Quote generalhospital2012: Hmm correct me if I am wrong, I thought that using names other than the character played on the show was against board guidelines in fact, here is the specific rule, don't preach on something you yourself don't practice, it could be a LITTLE bit hypocritical don't ya think?? Anyways here is the rule copied from the MB guidelines: 1. Abuse: We do not allow flaming, actor or poster bashing or baiting (insults) of any sort whether it be acting or physical appearance, profanity, racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual orientation slurs. We do not allow sexually-oriented material, nude avatars, or any other offensive material on the site. We reserve the right to remove postings that defame, insult or are abusive to any poster or actor, without question. We encourage you to use constructive criticism and tact. Debate/ argue the point, don't argue with the poster! (*Insulting the character by changing their name to some offensive name is considered baiting, childish and offensive to women. Example: Amber - Amwhore, Phyllis, Phylthy, etc. This is not tolerated. hmmm... interesting. I agree .. it is not allowed. However who ever would have actually READ my post would have realized that I used a METAPHOR. In English Language a Leech is: 1. Any of various chiefly aquatic bloodsucking or carnivorous annelid worms of the class Hirudinea, of which one species (Hirudo medicinalis) was formerly used by physicians to bleed patients and is now sometimes used as a temporary aid to circulation during surgical reattachment of a body part. 2. One that preys on or clings to another; a parasite. 3. Archaic A physician. In the context I used, a leech is a person who clings to or preys on another person. Now who does everyone here think I was referring to if it was so offensive or a bash?! So next time people who would like to bad post me, as well as the moderators, please read my post completely and then see if it is against the rules or not. Because I was definitely following the guidelines.. I have been following them since about 3 years now, and I do read them as they are updated! Thanks, Esprit! The reason I pointed it out, is because it is such a double standard. Like I think that Liz is a leech, because she is "clinging" to Nikolas, I would have the Liz fanbase chasing after me with picthforks!!! Now you see, I have read some of your posts before, about the "leech" sucking the life out of Jason, by YOU!!!! Well, first of all ... can you please copy and paste the link as well as the exact quote from my post (the part I bolded) that you apparently have read from my posts, because I have never said that. Especially since I have been off the boards for quite some time. Secondly, do u really think it was Sam I was referring to?! Who else was not on today?! There is no excuse ... I can use the term child endangerer for Sam f I really wanted to. Plus, who ever seems to have a problem with the term leech better check all the recent threads about Jax, Sonny, Jason, Claudia, Carly, Nik. Now that is some major character name calling. As for you talking about Elizabeth ... well, thanks for letting me know your dislike for the character. Doesn't bother me... after all it is fiction! For instance, Liz/Nik ... they r both leeches to one another... it is quite gag worthy. Even over the top Spixie being in love stuff, as well as Ja-Spin get leech worthy titles. But whatever ... I'd rather talk about Jason than the leech, or the child endangerer or the geek or the godfather in this thread!! If you don't like my post ... please move on ... do not try to bad post me without reading it twice. And like I mentioned, quote me the post I apparently did- that I have bolded in your reply above. Well, Esprit, you HAVE actually called Sam "the leech sucking the life out of Jason." I have read several of your posts where you say that and I will find them for you and paste them here, like you wanted GH2012 to do. I am also a little confused when you called someone a "child-endangerer"......who EXACTLY were you referring to, because there are LOTS of GH characters who endanger the lives of the children they are around, but since this is a Jason thread, I will just mention JASON as being a child endangerer. Don't get me wrong, I really LOVE the character of Jason, but let's face the facts, shall we: 1. Jason is a KILLER, therefore, ANY child that comes into contact with him is in danger of being killed. 2. Even Jason knows that he is a "child-endangerer", that is why he never wanted children of his own AND that is why he will not be a father to the son he accidentally (and drunkenly) made with liz. 3. Michael, whom Jason loves more than his own son, has had a rough life (and even been shot in the head) as a direct result of what his father and uncle Jason do for a living. Michael continues to struggle with the life he was brought up in and Jason doesn't make it any easier for him. 4. When the russian mob kidnapped liz's children last year, they did NOT know that Jake was Jason's son.....they just knew that the children's mother, liz, is a friend of Jason, so that was enough for the russian mob to kidnap the children. Just imagine how much worse it could have been, if they had known that Jake was the illegitimate son of Jason and liz. 5. Everytime Jason kills someone who is a father, he is making that child grow up fatherless, which kind of makes Jason selfish. He killed poor Alcazar for no reason (other than Sonny didn't like him) and now, Lila Rae has to grow up without her father. Jason even killed Alcazar with Lila Rae in the house, so that would make Jason a child-endangerer. 6. When Jason busted into the wrong cabin and pulled his gun on the mom with her 2 small children (when he was searching for Carly and Claudia), he could have accidentally killed one or both of those children. Then, he would have been a child-endangerer AND a child-murderer. 7. Even having Jason in the same vicinity with ANY child, makes him a child-endangerer, because Jason is ALWAYS going to be a mob target and any innocent person around him (whether it be an adult or a child and whether it be someone he knows or does not know) is in DANGER of being shot at and killed, even if that person was accidentally shot at. I could go on and on and on and on and on about Jason being a danger to ANY child, but I think you might get the message. I could also go on and on about almost everyone else on GH being a child-endangerer, but since this is a JASON ONLY thread, I decided to limit it to just Jason in this post. The mother of Jason's illegitimate son is also a child-endangerer, but if I bring up how she is, then someone will cry that I am "baiting" them since no one can be strong enough to take the truth about liz and not cry foul. I will admit something though. I have always wanted Jason to be a part of Jake's life and I thought liz was being selfish by denying Jason access to his son, but after watching the scenes where Michael killed Claudia and Jason got rid of the evidence and especially after watching him stand over Claudia's body while Max and Milo buried her, I realized just how cold, cruel and ruthless Jason can actually be. I got the shivers just watching Jason looking emotionless as Claudia's dead, lifeless body was being buried. I then realized, that I do NOT want Jason anywhere near Jake and now, I don't believe that liz is being selfish. I think liz is right to deny Jason access to Jake, because what if Jake grew up around Jason (and knew that Jason is his father) and then, he grew up and started having the exact same problems as Michael has had and continues to have? I can actually see this whole situation from a different view point now and I do believe that liz is doing the right thing, in regards to Jake. I have also, in the past, advocated for a JaSam "miracle" baby, but now, I don't know if that would be a good idea either. If Jason ever got out of the mob business, then I would love for Jason and Sam to have the baby that they have always wanted together, but since we all know that he will never give up the mob lifestyle (because he wouldn't even give it up for his OWN son), then, I don't want a JaSam baby. I love the character of Jason, but after the Claudia scenes (which were great, in a "soap" way, of course and eerie), I have seen another side of Jason that I knew was always there, but now I really feel that he is as cold and heartless as some say he is. Kudos to GH for writing and producing such a great week and kudos to Sarah Brown for an outstanding acting job when she was leaving the canvas as Claudia. |
GHVixen![]() |
Quote JASONandLIZforever: Quote alikat: Quote GH Princess: Quote alikat: Quote GH Princess: I know, but to say something ONLY happened because the writters made it implies that if they hadn't there would be a different outcome. Sorry Katie....enjoy your Jason/Dante romance my dear!! Yeah but you know...I think its way obvious when something makes the writers turn the GH ship 180 degrees in a different direction. They did that after the writers strike and left a lot of loose ends and they most certainly did that when they snagged Sarah Joy Brown back for two years. Ya, I have commented that I didn't like a s/l or that the writters did a poor job with this or that. But, to see someone say a charactor only did XYZ because the writters made them makes me go Not trying to start a fight - the comment just seemed, I don't know, a bit odd I guess. Oh yeah, I know what you mean. If the writers didn't write it then we didn't see it on the TV. So we can only go with that (as far as the show goes)...but of course we can always hope. And I always wonder what WOULD have been or what maybe was actually taped but ended up on the editing room floor that would explain more, etc... And yet, there is so much we are expected to assume that isn't on TV or written. That's the gray area we all look at differently at times. well gh really needs to stop the slashing of the film that ends up on the editors floor. cause there have been alot of missing scenes.. they are getting better at finishing lines and keeping stuff lately.. But, how do we "know" that there were scenes taped that were slashed and ended up on the editor's floor? We don't really know if that happened or not.....it is just pure speculation. I guess that could be an "answer" for some fans who refuse to see the truth as to what is actually happening on GH. I don't see what the big deal is, because nothing seems out of line or out of character on GH. I personally don't feel like I am missing a "piece of the great puzzle." Everything I see on GH presently seems to make logical sense and it is on par with what ALWAYS happens on GH. Jason is doing what he ALWAYS has done. He is NOT acting any differently than normal and everything is pretty "normal" for Jason. |
JASONandLIZf...![]() |
Quote GHVixen: Quote JASONandLIZforever: Quote alikat: Quote GH Princess: Quote alikat: Quote GH Princess: I know, but to say something ONLY happened because the writters made it implies that if they hadn't there would be a different outcome. Sorry Katie....enjoy your Jason/Dante romance my dear!! Yeah but you know...I think its way obvious when something makes the writers turn the GH ship 180 degrees in a different direction. They did that after the writers strike and left a lot of loose ends and they most certainly did that when they snagged Sarah Joy Brown back for two years. Ya, I have commented that I didn't like a s/l or that the writters did a poor job with this or that. But, to see someone say a charactor only did XYZ because the writters made them makes me go Not trying to start a fight - the comment just seemed, I don't know, a bit odd I guess. Oh yeah, I know what you mean. If the writers didn't write it then we didn't see it on the TV. So we can only go with that (as far as the show goes)...but of course we can always hope. And I always wonder what WOULD have been or what maybe was actually taped but ended up on the editing room floor that would explain more, etc... And yet, there is so much we are expected to assume that isn't on TV or written. That's the gray area we all look at differently at times. well gh really needs to stop the slashing of the film that ends up on the editors floor. cause there have been alot of missing scenes.. they are getting better at finishing lines and keeping stuff lately.. But, how do we "know" that there were scenes taped that were slashed and ended up on the editor's floor? We don't really know if that happened or not.....it is just pure speculation. I guess that could be an "answer" for some fans who refuse to see the truth as to what is actually happening on GH. I don't see what the big deal is, because nothing seems out of line or out of character on GH. I personally don't feel like I am missing a "piece of the great puzzle." Everything I see on GH presently seems to make logical sense and it is on par with what ALWAYS happens on GH. Jason is doing what he ALWAYS has done. He is NOT acting any differently than normal and everything is pretty "normal" for Jason. i wasnt referring to jason... exactly... i was referring to gh as a whole. how for the past year or so. gh has been cutting scenes.. important information, conversations have been cut out or missing.. like you couldnt follow the story. now i do have to admit what ever was going on vacations or whatever. where they had to rush scenes for what ever reason. gh is getting way better in that fact.. that conversations and information is not being left out.. it is getting better.. |
Devil-or-Angel![]() |
Quote GHVixen: Well, Esprit, you HAVE actually called Sam "the leech sucking the life out of Jason." I have read several of your posts where you say that and I will find them for you and paste them here, like you wanted GH2012 to do. I am also a little confused when you called someone a "child-endangerer"......who EXACTLY were you referring to, because there are LOTS of GH characters who endanger the lives of the children they are around, but since this is a Jason thread, I will just mention JASON as being a child endangerer. Don't get me wrong, I really LOVE the character of Jason, but let's face the facts, shall we: 1. Jason is a KILLER, therefore, ANY child that comes into contact with him is in danger of being killed. 2. Even Jason knows that he is a "child-endangerer", that is why he never wanted children of his own AND that is why he will not be a father to the son he accidentally (and drunkenly) made with liz. 3. Michael, whom Jason loves more than his own son, has had a rough life (and even been shot in the head) as a direct result of what his father and uncle Jason do for a living. Michael continues to struggle with the life he was brought up in and Jason doesn't make it any easier for him. 4. When the russian mob kidnapped liz's children last year, they did NOT know that Jake was Jason's son.....they just knew that the children's mother, liz, is a friend of Jason, so that was enough for the russian mob to kidnap the children. Just imagine how much worse it could have been, if they had known that Jake was the illegitimate son of Jason and liz. 5. Everytime Jason kills someone who is a father, he is making that child grow up fatherless, which kind of makes Jason selfish. He killed poor Alcazar for no reason (other than Sonny didn't like him) and now, Lila Rae has to grow up without her father. Jason even killed Alcazar with Lila Rae in the house, so that would make Jason a child-endangerer. 6. When Jason busted into the wrong cabin and pulled his gun on the mom with her 2 small children (when he was searching for Carly and Claudia), he could have accidentally killed one or both of those children. Then, he would have been a child-endangerer AND a child-murderer. 7. Even having Jason in the same vicinity with ANY child, makes him a child-endangerer, because Jason is ALWAYS going to be a mob target and any innocent person around him (whether it be an adult or a child and whether it be someone he knows or does not know) is in DANGER of being shot at and killed, even if that person was accidentally shot at. I could go on and on and on and on and on about Jason being a danger to ANY child, but I think you might get the message. I could also go on and on about almost everyone else on GH being a child-endangerer, but since this is a JASON ONLY thread, I decided to limit it to just Jason in this post. The mother of Jason's illegitimate son is also a child-endangerer, but if I bring up how she is, then someone will cry that I am "baiting" them since no one can be strong enough to take the truth about liz and not cry foul. I will admit something though. I have always wanted Jason to be a part of Jake's life and I thought liz was being selfish by denying Jason access to his son, but after watching the scenes where Michael killed Claudia and Jason got rid of the evidence and especially after watching him stand over Claudia's body while Max and Milo buried her, I realized just how cold, cruel and ruthless Jason can actually be. I got the shivers just watching Jason looking emotionless as Claudia's dead, lifeless body was being buried. I then realized, that I do NOT want Jason anywhere near Jake and now, I don't believe that liz is being selfish. I think liz is right to deny Jason access to Jake, because what if Jake grew up around Jason (and knew that Jason is his father) and then, he grew up and started having the exact same problems as Michael has had and continues to have? I can actually see this whole situation from a different view point now and I do believe that liz is doing the right thing, in regards to Jake. I have also, in the past, advocated for a JaSam "miracle" baby, but now, I don't know if that would be a good idea either. If Jason ever got out of the mob business, then I would love for Jason and Sam to have the baby that they have always wanted together, but since we all know that he will never give up the mob lifestyle (because he wouldn't even give it up for his OWN son), then, I don't want a JaSam baby. I love the character of Jason, but after the Claudia scenes (which were great, in a "soap" way, of course and eerie), I have seen another side of Jason that I knew was always there, but now I really feel that he is as cold and heartless as some say he is. Kudos to GH for writing and producing such a great week and kudos to Sarah Brown for an outstanding acting job when she was leaving the canvas as Claudia. Vixen, I love your post, I don't agree with EVERYTHING you said, but you just said it so well... Unlike you I do think Liz is being selfish. It's not like she didn't know who/what Jason is/does. She has known him (and according to their fans better than anyone else) for over 10 years. From the very begining she has said repeatedly that his life is too dangerous. So why did she tell him? She obviously did not have any intention of letting him be part of Jake's life, unless he left the mob. But since she knows him so well, shouldn't she have known that he doesn't really want too? Was she using Jake to try to get Jasonto change? IMO She only told Jason because she knew that that was the only way she could keep him tied to her and when it didn't work, when he didn't change for her as she hoped, she played the "your life is too dangerous" card to back him off, but yet still keep him tied to her.... Anywho, I loved your post (all of them).... |
esprit![]() |
I think the word I am looking for is "Anyway". |
cincyghfan![]() |
Can't we all just play nice LOL!!!! |
MoBetta![]() |
Quote cincyghfan: Can't we all just play nice LOL!!!! I agree 100%. I love Jason, but at times I wont even post do to the tention, between past and present relationships. Just crazy. Personally I love his storyline, but then you start reading distasteful things and it just turns you off. So, I read and when I feel the waters are safe to swim I get in. |
Jasam09![]() |
Quote cincyghfan: Can't we all just play nice LOL!!!! Thank you Cincy, for that!!!! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
dalal01![]() |
Quote Devil-or-Angel: Quote esprit: Quote meowbowow: Quote esprit: Like I said if you don't "agree" with my post, ignore and move on. I am not some lame duck with baseless arguments. I do like to follow logic and guidelines ... a reason why I am not enjoying GH these days, but that is a debate for another day. And moving on ... this thread is about Jason ... who apparently today did not need to prop anyone on the show (alas). And that made me very happy!! Well, it is like what Steve Burton has said and has been saying since July now: "Jason isn't just brain damaged anymore... he is just plain stupid now". And that is a real quote from his PA! He was probably referring to the PREVIOUS two years of Jason's life...cause I follow his twitter account (since Aug of this year) I've never seen him say anything of the sort...He actually seems quite happy with how Jason is right now He sure does!!! Even in his interview with Michael Fairman he said jason needs some loving. and DofA I dont know why you keep getting reported. You arent breaking any guidelines. |
genhospchat![]() |
Quote esprit: I think the word I am looking for is "Anyway". I am happy people follow SBu on twitter.. not sure what to respond to that. But I will also add that if you get the chance, go to his PA or even the FCW. He is awesome & hilarious... I have had the pleasure of meeting and talking with him in person (among others in GH cast). A very nice and down to earth guy indeed. As for my quote, I would like the entire post along with date/time, just to see the context it was originally said in (if it was). And as for Steve's quote... he said it at his FCW PA July 18th 2009, and it was published in Aug 24th 2009 SID issue. And yes it was regarding the current storyline and what's in store for JAson in the Fall of 2009. I cannot post any links other than YT, but there is an online scan of that mag. No way of spinning his words this time... Anyway, I am off to enjoy my weekend ... hope everyone has a good one. I remember that article. |
Nightmoves![]() |
Quote cincyghfan: Can't we all just play nice LOL!!!! Some are incapable. Kind of reminds me of my daughter when she can't get her own way. |
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.