|
|
Soaps Boards :: General Hospital Forum :: Liz Doesn't Deserve Someone As Good As Lucky Period.
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
really241![]() |
Quote alikat: NM...I didn't take offense to your DEBATE on the opposing side from me. (See how that works when we are adults...you didn't just highlight my post and call me a dumb poopyhead or worse) I love debate and you and many others know it. When there are two well thought out arguments, the pro and the con, I truly enjoy this board. Okay...stepping down off the soapbox. Teehee Now...for the crux of your argument. Well...I don't have one. I think she's wrong too. I guess I'm just looking into why. If it were a character I don't like...I probably wouldn't look that deep. And yes, I too am guilty of saying "she should know better" but that doesn't stop the true depths of the reason WHY she's doing it. And lets face it. This may be a biblical transgression or a moral sin but it's not a criminal act so there is a MAJOR difference. Some things, no matter what the past holds are unexcusable. Now finally, and Nightmoves, I'm specifically asking you this, although I'd love to see others chime in as well...your statement It just makes me angry. When I saw Lucky standing there alone and confused, and then on the phone with Laura it made me almost shed a tear for him, something I've never done before Is this exactly how you would have felt had it been Greg Vaughan's Lucky instead of Jonathan Jackson's? I didn't watch when JJ was on. I've seen the total love many longtime viewers have for him. I tend to wonder if empathy won't unconsciously or inadvertantly be given to Lucky now that the beloved original character (the one that NEVER did anything wrong to Elizabeth) is playing the role again. adressing the end portion of your statement I can say that I would still feel bad for Lucky but not to the depth that I feel for THE Lucky. It is something about the way that he portrays lucky probably bc he made lucky what he is (not the boob cant solve a crime part the lucky that we Love or in some peoples case used to Love) Yesterday there was no pressure and NM was right there were multiple outs that were given and none were taken...had she of said I love you but I cant spend the rest of my life with you that would be one thing but she made matters worse by saying I love you and it has always been my dream to live in this house and raise the boys with you and that is what I want..... Again I think that there is more sympathy for Lucky right now bc it is JJ and he knows how to not just play lucky but he is Lucky.... |
onlygh![]() |
Quote really241: Again I think that there is more sympathy for Lucky right now bc it is JJ and he knows how to not just play lucky but he is Lucky.... Excellent point really. I fully admit to feeling that way myself. With GV as Lucky, my feeling was...go for it Liz...get yourself a little somethin' somethin'...you deserve it. With JJ as Lucky, my feeling is...Liz, behave yourself and be true to your forever-love. |
Nightmoves![]() |
Quote alikat: NM...I didn't take offense to your DEBATE on the opposing side from me. (See how that works when we are adults...you didn't just highlight my post and call me a dumb poopyhead or worse) I love debate and you and many others know it. When there are two well thought out arguments, the pro and the con, I truly enjoy this board. Okay...stepping down off the soapbox. Teehee Now...for the crux of your argument. Well...I don't have one. I think she's wrong too. I guess I'm just looking into why. If it were a character I don't like...I probably wouldn't look that deep. And yes, I too am guilty of saying "she should know better" but that doesn't stop the true depths of the reason WHY she's doing it. And lets face it. This may be a biblical transgression or a moral sin but it's not a criminal act so there is a MAJOR difference. Some things, no matter what the past holds are unexcusable. Now finally, and Nightmoves, I'm specifically asking you this, although I'd love to see others chime in as well...your statement It just makes me angry. When I saw Lucky standing there alone and confused, and then on the phone with Laura it made me almost shed a tear for him, something I've never done before Is this exactly how you would have felt had it been Greg Vaughan's Lucky instead of Jonathan Jackson's? I didn't watch when JJ was on. I've seen the total love many longtime viewers have for him. I tend to wonder if empathy won't unconsciously or inadvertantly be given to Lucky now that the beloved original character (the one that NEVER did anything wrong to Elizabeth) is playing the role again. I love a good old fashion non-sarcastic dabate as well Ali Just for the record, I was not referring to criminal acts but "biblical" as well, as you put it. Carly and Maxie come to mind to name a few, but on to your question... No. I belive I would not have been so angry had it been GV's Lucky, whom I did like too. I think I would have been mildly upset and shook my head at Liz but that would have been it. I did mention in my above post that JJ's Lucky, to me anyway, is a kinder and gentler Lucky and, yes I do think that affects my opinion rational or not I also think that Liz took it a bit farther yesterday then she has in the past and that also had something to do with it. |
katie28![]() |
as always, NM- love your posts! |
CarlylovesSonny![]() |
I don't mean to jump into your debate, but I think regardless of who is playing Lucky right now...what Liz is doing is wrong. Although Alikat makes solid arguments, they are basis and I completely respect the fact that you admit this. I've noticed that people support their favorites wit such vigor, but don't recognize their own basis in their arguments. Elizabeth is hurting a man who hurt her in the past, but she is also hurting two innocent children. Two little boys who have done nothing wrong. Lucky may not be there father, but Jason is not their father either or at least in every real sense of the word. It bothers me when people say that Jason should be Cake. Jason should be father to Jake, but not Cameron. Lucky is Cameron's father. Jason will NEVER be his father, his step-father maybe, but not this father. I find amusing that in the soapland DNA means everything, but the actions of a father mean nothing. We can also argue that Lucky hasn't been the best dad. His drug story, his verbal abuse toward Elizabeth, ect. However, we only see some of the family moments and some of the glimpses of the father that Lucky is to the boys. They don't show us very much. They focus on the drama and we define Lucky as a father in those moments. A lot of them at bad. I think it's funny that most of the moments we see of Liz as mother are also bad, but we don't let those moments define her. I don't think the audience has ever been fair to GV's Lucky. But I think we all have to admit and Liz admits it as well and she's done it many in the last few weeks that Lucky loves those little boys and he is a good dad. With JJ playing Lucky, I think we might see end of the stigma that Liz can do no wrong and see Lucky receive a little more attention as an actor on and off the canvas. I am personally sick of the Liason/Jasam debate and I'd love to see Lucky find a woman who loves him with everything that she is. I don't think Liz is capable of that anymore. I think that GH needs a new couple JJ could be the half of that. Lucky is truly a "legacy character" ( I'm not sure what that means but it is thrown around a lot) and he deserves to be treated with respect. Give him a little thunder or something!! |
frustratedfan![]() |
Do I like this story? NO but not for the reasons you might think. It's a soapy story line...a classic...torn between two brothers. It's as old as soaps. That part doesn't bother me. After all, it is a SOAP and that's what they do. |
GHSince1999![]() |
LOL at thread title. All episode yesterday that was what i was thinking bc for me JJ is not the GV/JY Lucky. |
alikat![]() |
Quote Nightmoves:I love a good old fashion non-sarcastic dabate as well Ali . Wait...I LOVE sarchasm. I love debate but I LOOOOVE sarchasm as well. Teehee. However, sometimes people don't get it so I try to avoid it. I guess it's all about respect and that darned grain of salt right? But back to the discussion. I agree with all of you. Elizabeth is completely wrong. She's acting out. She's contradicting herself and she's a grown adult that KNOWS better. And yet we all, hopefully not to her extent, have faults. Do things we shouldn't. Act in manners that are unbecoming. Make poor decisions we regret. We've hidden things from our husband "because they don't need to know". We've flirted a little too much with a guy that wasn't our husband, fiancee or boyfriend. Some of us have actually even cheated. And we all knew better. Elizabeth is crossing a line. She's not being honest (which to me has been her MO for most of her life). She lies to protect people. To make them happy. She's telling Lucky what she thinks he wants to hear. And yet, he can see right through her. Why doesn't he call her on her shyt? HE is afraid to hear the truth. Obviously he doesn't know what that truth is. He thinks she still isn't over Jason. (Which I doubt she is but that's another argument) He thinks her guilt stems from their past. It doesn't. She's guilty for her current feelings. Like I said...there's something deep down that triggers this bad behavior in her. AND YES IT IS JUST THAT...BAD BEHAVIOR. A moral decomposition. And YES I think she IS trying. Now I have no answer to why she shows up at Wyndemere so often but with as often as people show up, it seems as hard to me as if I were to stroll across the street to my neighbors (yes my neighbor has a mote and a launch and a creepy but nice butler named Alfred that lets any old person in And whomever said that Luke said that he worried for Lucky but now worries for Elizabeth to be the one feeling trapped...Luke hit the nail on the head. Which is what I've been saying all along. She feels trapped to live this life that everyone expects of her. (and has felt that way for practically her whole life) But doesn't know how to stop herself from walking further into the trap. Isn't equipped with the ability to hurt Lucky. To knowingly disappoint her kids, Lucky, the Spencers, Grams, etc...She's incapable of stopping herself from going forward with what SHE thinks is the right choice and she's also incapable of stopping her impulses to do the wrong thing when the opportunity presents itself. But don't tell me Lucky is the victim here. Lucky is the greatest manipulator where Elizabeth is concerned. In my eyes (and like I said...I'm not sympathetic nor am I viewing with a predetermined love of JJ), Lucky has done a lot to tear down Elizabeth over the years. That affects you. You don't walk away from everything that Lucky has put Elizabeth through unscathed. Now that doesn't mean he DESERVES what Elizabeth is doing to him but again, I don't think he DESERVES Elizabeth in the first place. Not yet at least. I have not seen the pennance being paid to equal his crimes against her. Then again, THAT is the writers faults. I guess they forgot that there's viewers like me who have never seen the totally lovable Lucky. |
Stacy1975![]() |
Quote onlygh: Quote really241: Again I think that there is more sympathy for Lucky right now bc it is JJ and he knows how to not just play lucky but he is Lucky.... Excellent point really. I fully admit to feeling that way myself. With GV as Lucky, my feeling was...go for it Liz...get yourself a little somethin' somethin'...you deserve it. With JJ as Lucky, my feeling is...Liz, behave yourself and be true to your forever-love. Exactly!! Although I'm not completely stuck on L&L2-The Return, I'm having a really tough time facing anything that's gonna hurt my Lucky. If there is no L&L2, I want it to be Lucky doing the hurting now, not the other way around. I know there is no way to protect him from this, I just wish Aunt Ruby were around to make him a bowl of chili to make him feel better. |
Burst-JasonLiz![]() |
I love Elizabeth Webber even when she is a little misguided in her love life at the moment. |
Nightmoves![]() |
[quote]Quote alikat: [quote]Quote (yes my neighbor has a mote and a launch and a creepy but nice butler named Alfred that lets any old person in |
alikat![]() |
Quote Stacy1975: I know there is no way to protect him from this, I just wish Aunt Ruby were around to make him a bowl of chili to make him feel better. |
alikat![]() |
CarlylovesSonny: |
alikat![]() |
Quote Nightmoves: there is NO way Lucky could know what is truly bothering Liz. I don't think he would EVER think she is sleeping with his brother therefore, I don't think he is clueless. Exactly, because she's not being truthful with him. He won't know unless she tells him. I have freely said I think she's wrong. And you are correct, I don't think Lucky would EVER suspect something going on between Nik and Elizabeth. Which is why I think he'll put more fault on his brother than on Elizabeth...not sure why...just a feeling. Which is why this story is so friggin good!!! |
genhospchat![]() |
Quote Lisa Wu-Hartwell: genhospchat, what makes you think that this thread is going to get closed? Anti-Liz people have the right to express our opinion as Pro-Liz people do. I'am a proud Anti-Liz. My apologies Lisa. |
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.