Tell your friends
POPULAR SEARCHES
|
|
List of Shows
Featured Blogs
The Bold and the Beautiful - MESSAGE BOARDS
Soaps Boards :: The Bold and the Beautiful Forum :: I think it's wrong that they took Brooke's kids away!
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
I think it's wrong that they took Brooke's kids away!
Started by knw_kris84 at 2007/07/29 11:30AMLatest post: 2007/07/31 10:30PM, Views: 362, Replies: 22
#11
2007/07/31 04:52AM
Re: I think it's wrong that they took Brooke's kids away!
knw_kris84 |
And it's better for those kids to be w/ Stephanie who is running her own agenda instead of looking out for the best interests of the children?? Not allowing the kids mother to see them just to say goodnight, that is what is best for them? I have to disagree. Stephanie does not give a crap about those kids at all, she only cares about hurting Brooke, and who cares how it affects the kids. If she truely loved those kids she would not be doing this...she would not be forbidding Brooke to see her children. |
#12
2007/07/31 04:57AM
Re: I think it's wrong that they took Brooke's kids away!
1Sandy |
Quote knw_kris84: And it's better for those kids to be w/ Stephanie who is running her own agenda instead of looking out for the best interests of the children?? Not allowing the kids mother to see them just to say goodnight, that is what is best for them? I have to disagree. Stephanie does not give a crap about those kids at all, she only cares about hurting Brooke, and who cares how it affects the kids. If she truely loved those kids she would not be doing this...she would not be forbidding Brooke to see her children. I agree with everything you have posted! Stephanie already got "what she wanted" by having those kids taking away. Wy can't she let it rest and let Brooke go her own way and stand on her feet. Steph's only interest is to hurt Brooke! Get over it! At least you still have Eric (spineless man) in your life! |
#13
2007/07/31 07:56AM
Re: I think it's wrong that they took Brooke's kids away!
Revasfan |
Quote knw_kris84: And it's better for those kids to be w/ Stephanie who is running her own agenda instead of looking out for the best interests of the children?? Not allowing the kids mother to see them just to say goodnight, that is what is best for them? I have to disagree. Stephanie does not give a crap about those kids at all, she only cares about hurting Brooke, and who cares how it affects the kids. If she truely loved those kids she would not be doing this...she would not be forbidding Brooke to see her children. Stephanie and Brooke are the same, except for Stephanie takes what she wants by the throat and Brooke takes what she wants on her back. Niether one of them gives a dang about those kids. Brooke always wants what she can't have and that's the only reason why she cares. Stephanie's bad but Brooke aint no better. I'd rather have a hag for a mother over a wh-ore |
#14
2007/07/31 08:35AM
Re: I think it's wrong that they took Brooke's kids away!
|
knw_kris84 |
Quote 1Sandy: Quote missbrooke: for me i have to blame brooke for telling her sister she was pulling up the street. yes nudonna should have waited until brooke came through the door. but the lighter incident? that was brooke and nicky's fault there. Yes - but in all reality I say 99% of households have either lighters or matches in their homes. Its up to the parents to "tell and teach" their children at a VERY young age NOT TO PLAY WITH MATCHES! Nick's lighter fell out of his pocket - by accident! He did not mean it. Yet Hope knew it was wrong and so did RJ - they both said it before she lit the candle. She just wanted to have a candle for their picnic. Its true they are only children. But don't tell me that EVERYONE & ANYONE that smokes or DOES NOT smoke in their home DOES NOT have a lighter or matches??? My husband & I DO NOT SMOKE - but when my relatives come over I take out an ashtray for them. I also have in the way back of one of our drawers matches - in case the lights go out for candles. My children are well aware and KNOW NEVER TO GO NEAR THEM or even touch a smelly old ashtray. But again - I have friends who have younger children - show smoke around them. That Dorothy social worker said it so stupid like: "You should NOT BE smoking around kids". Come on now - you ask half the country: If a spouse or other relative does smoke - they probably do in fornt of children. My relatives do. They bring their own lighters. On this show - it was GOOD to show viwers HOW DANGEROUS it is too touch or play with a lighter. But I personally DO NOT FEEL LIKE it was Nick's fault. Just curiosity from Hope and an accident. Even though B&B writers might have shown how dangerous it is for viwers. How many viwers are actually kids of this show? The lighter issue was an accident and no one'e fault! Exactly...Hope knew it was wrong to play w/ the lighter but she was curious. Show me a child who has NEVER disobeyed his or her parents. If you can do that then you're lying b/c there's no such thing. I mean, let's get real people...you can't even take your eyes off your kids for a few minutes to go into the other room and make them dinner?? Accidents happen, that's why they call them accidents. I think that them taking the kids was going way overboard and in all honesty I think that the CPS lady only took them b/c Stephanie had poisoned her mind w/ all this bull crap about Brooke! Yeah, ok Brooke is a tramp, she sleeps w/ all the men in one family, Brooke is this and Brooke is that, we could go on all day long, but that is not the issue here. The issue is if Brooke is a good mother to Hope and R.J. and from what I can see she is. Brooke may not have always been a good mother to Rick and Bridget, but that is not the issue either. Rick and Bridget are grown, the issue is Brooke's capability to take care of Hope and R.J. and what I see is a very loving mother who adores her children and they adore her too. I don't even know why Stephanie keeps calling Hope her granddaughter b/c Hope is not even Ridge's son or related to the Forrester's in any way. So what right do they have to even take Hope. I mean, I guess it is better for her to be w/ people she knows instead of in foster care, but what I don't understand is where the hell is Ridge??? CPS put those children in the care of RIDGE, not Stephanie, but Ridge is more concerned w/ getting Ashley in bed and does not even care that these children were just ripped from their mother and are probably scared and confused. The whole thing is ridiculous. |
#15
2007/07/31 08:40AM
Re: I think it's wrong that they took Brooke's kids away!
|
Revasfan |
Quote knw_kris84: Quote 1Sandy: Quote missbrooke: for me i have to blame brooke for telling her sister she was pulling up the street. yes nudonna should have waited until brooke came through the door. but the lighter incident? that was brooke and nicky's fault there. Yes - but in all reality I say 99% of households have either lighters or matches in their homes. Its up to the parents to "tell and teach" their children at a VERY young age NOT TO PLAY WITH MATCHES! Nick's lighter fell out of his pocket - by accident! He did not mean it. Yet Hope knew it was wrong and so did RJ - they both said it before she lit the candle. She just wanted to have a candle for their picnic. Its true they are only children. But don't tell me that EVERYONE & ANYONE that smokes or DOES NOT smoke in their home DOES NOT have a lighter or matches??? My husband & I DO NOT SMOKE - but when my relatives come over I take out an ashtray for them. I also have in the way back of one of our drawers matches - in case the lights go out for candles. My children are well aware and KNOW NEVER TO GO NEAR THEM or even touch a smelly old ashtray. But again - I have friends who have younger children - show smoke around them. That Dorothy social worker said it so stupid like: "You should NOT BE smoking around kids". Come on now - you ask half the country: If a spouse or other relative does smoke - they probably do in fornt of children. My relatives do. They bring their own lighters. On this show - it was GOOD to show viwers HOW DANGEROUS it is too touch or play with a lighter. But I personally DO NOT FEEL LIKE it was Nick's fault. Just curiosity from Hope and an accident. Even though B&B writers might have shown how dangerous it is for viwers. How many viwers are actually kids of this show? The lighter issue was an accident and no one'e fault! Exactly...Hope knew it was wrong to play w/ the lighter but she was curious. Show me a child who has NEVER disobeyed his or her parents. If you can do that then you're lying b/c there's no such thing. I mean, let's get real people...you can't even take your eyes off your kids for a few minutes to go into the other room and make them dinner?? Accidents happen, that's why they call them accidents. I think that them taking the kids was going way overboard and in all honesty I think that the CPS lady only took them b/c Stephanie had poisoned her mind w/ all this bull crap about Brooke! Yeah, ok Brooke is a tramp, she sleeps w/ all the men in one family, Brooke is this and Brooke is that, we could go on all day long, but that is not the issue here. The issue is if Brooke is a good mother to Hope and R.J. and from what I can see she is. Brooke may not have always been a good mother to Rick and Bridget, but that is not the issue either. Rick and Bridget are grown, the issue is Brooke's capability to take care of Hope and R.J. and what I see is a very loving mother who adores her children and they adore her too. I don't even know why Stephanie keeps calling Hope her granddaughter b/c Hope is not even Ridge's son or related to the Forrester's in any way. So what right do they have to even take Hope. I mean, I guess it is better for her to be w/ people she knows instead of in foster care, but what I don't understand is where the hell is Ridge??? CPS put those children in the care of RIDGE, not Stephanie, but Ridge is more concerned w/ getting Ashley in bed and does not even care that these children were just ripped from their mother and are probably scared and confused. The whole thing is ridiculous. I think the kids are more scared & confused from being left alone all night long, and almost being burned alive. They'll be fine without Brooke. They go with out her enough anyway. And Ridge is stuck to Ashley? So how much time do you think the kids got when Brooke was stuck to both Nick and Ridge. At least Stephanie aint leaving them alone.  thanks Donna/ TrampyMcTramp.
|
#16
2007/07/31 08:41AM
Re: I think it's wrong that they took Brooke's kids away!
|
knw_kris84 |
Quote Revasfan: Quote knw_kris84: Quote 1Sandy: Quote missbrooke: for me i have to blame brooke for telling her sister she was pulling up the street. yes nudonna should have waited until brooke came through the door. but the lighter incident? that was brooke and nicky's fault there. Yes - but in all reality I say 99% of households have either lighters or matches in their homes. Its up to the parents to "tell and teach" their children at a VERY young age NOT TO PLAY WITH MATCHES! Nick's lighter fell out of his pocket - by accident! He did not mean it. Yet Hope knew it was wrong and so did RJ - they both said it before she lit the candle. She just wanted to have a candle for their picnic. Its true they are only children. But don't tell me that EVERYONE & ANYONE that smokes or DOES NOT smoke in their home DOES NOT have a lighter or matches??? My husband & I DO NOT SMOKE - but when my relatives come over I take out an ashtray for them. I also have in the way back of one of our drawers matches - in case the lights go out for candles. My children are well aware and KNOW NEVER TO GO NEAR THEM or even touch a smelly old ashtray. But again - I have friends who have younger children - show smoke around them. That Dorothy social worker said it so stupid like: "You should NOT BE smoking around kids". Come on now - you ask half the country: If a spouse or other relative does smoke - they probably do in fornt of children. My relatives do. They bring their own lighters. On this show - it was GOOD to show viwers HOW DANGEROUS it is too touch or play with a lighter. But I personally DO NOT FEEL LIKE it was Nick's fault. Just curiosity from Hope and an accident. Even though B&B writers might have shown how dangerous it is for viwers. How many viwers are actually kids of this show? The lighter issue was an accident and no one'e fault! Exactly...Hope knew it was wrong to play w/ the lighter but she was curious. Show me a child who has NEVER disobeyed his or her parents. If you can do that then you're lying b/c there's no such thing. I mean, let's get real people...you can't even take your eyes off your kids for a few minutes to go into the other room and make them dinner?? Accidents happen, that's why they call them accidents. I think that them taking the kids was going way overboard and in all honesty I think that the CPS lady only took them b/c Stephanie had poisoned her mind w/ all this bull crap about Brooke! Yeah, ok Brooke is a tramp, she sleeps w/ all the men in one family, Brooke is this and Brooke is that, we could go on all day long, but that is not the issue here. The issue is if Brooke is a good mother to Hope and R.J. and from what I can see she is. Brooke may not have always been a good mother to Rick and Bridget, but that is not the issue either. Rick and Bridget are grown, the issue is Brooke's capability to take care of Hope and R.J. and what I see is a very loving mother who adores her children and they adore her too. I don't even know why Stephanie keeps calling Hope her granddaughter b/c Hope is not even Ridge's son or related to the Forrester's in any way. So what right do they have to even take Hope. I mean, I guess it is better for her to be w/ people she knows instead of in foster care, but what I don't understand is where the hell is Ridge??? CPS put those children in the care of RIDGE, not Stephanie, but Ridge is more concerned w/ getting Ashley in bed and does not even care that these children were just ripped from their mother and are probably scared and confused. The whole thing is ridiculous. I think the kids are more scared & confused from being left alone all night long, and almost being burned alive. They'll be fine without Brooke. They go with out her enough anyway. And Ridge is stuck to Ashley? So how much time do you think the kids got when Brooke was stuck to both Nick and Ridge. At least Stephanie aint leaving them alone. thanks Donna/ TrampyMcTramp. They need their mother. The poor kids are going to be traumatized for the rest of their lives from being w/ Stephanie so long!! I would be, that woman is a witch!! |
#17
2007/07/31 09:21AM
Re: I think it's wrong that they took Brooke's kids away!
Puss |
As someone who is a caregiver and knows a lot about child protective services I don't think they should have taken her children away. For one Donna is indirectly to blame for the first incident and in the second incident it was an accident - are peoples children taken away everytime there is a house fire???? |
#18
2007/07/31 10:30PM
Re: I think it's wrong that they took Brooke's kids away!
JLiz4ever |
They definitely should not have taken the children away. But supervision is the key. Of course accidents happen..but a 6 year old burning down the house isn't an accident...its negligence. Still she should have been visited by child services and monitored for a while. Even though Donna left the kids alone, they are Brooke's responsibility...so you do have to wonder about her judgement leaving them in the care of an irresponsible person like Donna. |
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
