|
|
Soaps Boards :: The Bold and the Beautiful Forum :: I think it's wrong that they took Brooke's kids away!
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
knw_kris84![]() |
First of all, the incident that occured where the children were left alone overnight was not all Brooke's fault. The children were in the care of their Aunt Donna and she NEVER should have left until she saw Brooke walk in that door. Yes, Brooke fell asleep in her car, but she didn't do that intentionally. She didn't TRY to fall asleep. IMO that was mostly Donna's fault for leaving. I understand she had a flight to catch, and if Brooke was late there were any number of people she could have called to come care for the children until Brooke got back. She could have called Ridge, Nick, Bridget, Rick, Eric, but she just left w/out making sure that it was actually Brooke coming home. |
Mona Lisa![]() |
I am glad she lost the kids. It might make her be a better mother, when she gets them back. She needs to have them as her 1st priority. and not live her life soely, pursuring her destiny, as to which mans bed ahe will be sharing. We all know she will get them back |
knw_kris84![]() |
i think shes a good mother to hope and r.j. and the circumstances that led to her losing the kids were not her fault. |
momofthree![]() |
I for one found it ironic when Stephanie and Taylor were talking about Thorne and how bad things were for him and how it could affect Alexandria. Where is Alexandria during all of this? Does he foist her off with the nanny? How healthy is it to have a drunk and a pill-popper for a father? Is Stephanie going to step in and suggest that she keep Alexandria? I mean come on, wouldn't it have been a better storyline if this would have happened to Thorne given the siutation he has put himself into? |
Revasfan![]() |
Quote Mona Lisa: I am glad she lost the kids. It might make her be a better mother, when she gets them back. She needs to have them as her 1st priority. and not live her life soely, pursuring her destiny, as to which mans bed ahe will be sharing. We all know she will get them back I know the stuff that happened wasn't her fault but she threw the blame all on Stephanie and for once, it wasn't her fault either. She should have had her kids taken away until the authorities could evaluate the situation. The kids were surrounded in flames for crying out loud and all she was doing was shouting! |
Bedroomeyes![]() |
As parents, anything happens in your house is your responsibility especially when it comes to the well being of your kids. Brooke is the sole care giver of these kids, it was HER arranging the babysiter, so it was her responsibility to be there when the babysitter had to depart. The schedule of the babysitter was something Brooke was well aware of before departing the home. IT was her state of mind that caused the neglect to take place. Your job as a parent is to be sure that your kids are properly taken care of, and if you need to be home by a certain hour, and you're not, that falls on you due to the fact you had knowledge of the matter before hand. |
Revasfan![]() |
Quote Bedroomeyes: As parents, anything happens in your house is your responsibility especially when it comes to the well being of your kids. Brooke is the sole care giver of these kids, it was HER arranging the babysiter, so it was her responsibility to be there when the babysitter had to depart. The schedule of the babysitter was something Brooke was well aware of before departing the home. IT was her state of mind that caused the neglect to take place. Your job as a parent is to be sure that your kids are properly taken care of, and if you need to be home by a certain hour, and you're not, that falls on you due to the fact you had knowledge of the matter before hand. Whether Brooke fell asleep accidently or not, it lead to those kids being home alone, due to her speaking with the sitter seconds before the car thought to be hers, pulled up in the drive. Then you turn around and there's a second incident happens while Brooke is suppose to be over seeing her children. How many accident have to occur before the kids are tragicly hurt or God forbid, killed, before Brooke will be held responsible for her role in this? Do you realize how careless it sounds to try and explain away 2 seperate incidents within a 24 hour spand? AT this point Brooke cannot care for these children, should couldn't help them the night she fell asleep in the car, and she couldn't care for them the night they nearly burned to death right before her eyes. What else has to happen to prove that these kids need help, think about it, one night you're terrified from being home alone all night long at their ages, and the next day, they stare death in the face. Very true. It wansn't her fault that those things happened but they did and something needs to be done about it. Like if you took your child to daycare and stuff like that happened you wouldn't bring them back |
Bedroomeyes![]() |
IF a daycare facility left your child alone in a hot van because the driver's mind was occupied with a relationship gone bad, would you bring your child back? Again, your job as a caregiver, whether it's a parent or a child care provider, is to take care of children, and Brooke should have taken better care of her young children, bottom line. These things happened in Brooke's home, and if I had kids, I wouldnt' allow them over there after two small children were left home alone all night long, and the next day, they damn near burned to death in a fire, strike two, it doesn't takea strike three for me. |
Revasfan![]() |
Quote Bedroomeyes: IF a daycare facility left your child alone in a hot van because the driver's mind was occupied with a relationship gone bad, would you bring your child back? Again, your job as a caregiver, whether it's a parent or a child care provider, is to take care of children, and Brooke should have taken better care of her young children, bottom line. These things happened in Brooke's home, and if I had kids, I wouldnt' allow them over there after two small children were left home alone all night long, and the next day, they damn near burned to death in a fire, strike two, it doesn't takea strike three for me. True again. These are things that could have been prevented. She didn't cause them on purpose but they happened when they didn't have to. |
SndrElkins![]() |
Quote knw_kris84: i think shes a good mother to hope and r.j. and the circumstances that led to her losing the kids were not her fault. ITA!! At least she is a better Mother then Stephanie |
1Sandy![]() |
Quote knw_kris84: First of all, the incident that occured where the children were left alone overnight was not all Brooke's fault. The children were in the care of their Aunt Donna and she NEVER should have left until she saw Brooke walk in that door. Yes, Brooke fell asleep in her car, but she didn't do that intentionally. She didn't TRY to fall asleep. IMO that was mostly Donna's fault for leaving. I understand she had a flight to catch, and if Brooke was late there were any number of people she could have called to come care for the children until Brooke got back. She could have called Ridge, Nick, Bridget, Rick, Eric, but she just left w/out making sure that it was actually Brooke coming home. The second incident that occured in which she was making dinner and Hope started a fire, it was an accident for pete's sake!! Brooke couldn't help it that those two incidents happened w/in 24 hours of eachother! It's not like she abandoned them...she was making them dinner!! Parent's cannot watch their children every single second of every single day. As long as you know that your children are in a safe place and not like running around in the streets unattended, it's ok to go make dinner! I mean, when I around Hope's age, my mother was cleaning the house and I climbed up on the bathroom sink, got in the medicine cabinent, opened up the child-proof bottle of childrens tylenol and ate the whole bottle. You can't expect parents to just run around after their children every second and never take their eyes off them. What if Brooke had to go to the bathroom or something? She can't leave her kids for 2 seconds to go take a pee? The whole thing is ridiculous, and then to top it off Stephanie is being a royal b**** about it. That was so ignorant not to let Brooke say goodnight to her kids. I could have just slapped her across the face. And Ridge is not acting much better if you ask me. I understand that Brooke is going thru an emotional crisis. The ending of a relationship is sometimes a hard thing to go thru, but she always made sure her kids were taken care of. You can say a lot of things about Brooke...yeah she's a tramp, yeah she slept w/ all the men in one family, yeah she does a lot of really stupid things, but one thing you can't say is that she is a bad mother to Hope and R.J. IMO those kids never should have been taken from her. I agree with you 100%! Everyone keeps saying that Stephanie had NOTHING to do with it. PLEASE... Yes the social worker was called in, but it was Stephanie adding wood to the fire when she HAD TO tell Dorothy that Nick almost killed "Hope" in the hot tub. Here they are (Steph & Dot) talking about Brooke leaving her children with a dangerous man as a babysitter, and yet he is going to be a father soon. Nick is a good man. He has always been there for Brooke & her children. Where has Ridge been seen this past week SINCE he got the children??? Everyone talks about Brooke sleeping around, but so far all I seen since RIDGE took the children was him wining, dining & seducing Ashley. So much for his "TIME" with the children who he ande Steph claim could have and are slight tramatized by the entire events. Brooke did not deseerve this to happen to her. Just a few weeks ago BOTH Ridge & Steph should have kissed her feet for making her son Rick help RIdge out of his situation - yet HE GOT OFF scott-free. Then Brooke even had the decency to NOT TELL the police that the so-called Grandma Stephanie (to Dorothy) that she tried strangling Brooke with the telephone cord, kidnapped her and shot a gun and threatened her to come out of the car. Why didn't Brooke tell Storm to brin that up. Now those kids are staying with Steph. I seem to recall years back when she snapped more than once: #1 - When Eric married Brooke - Stephanie left the home drove to a bad area of LA - lost her memory and was living with the homeless people and lost for a while. #2 - She tried to kill Brooke at BIG BEAR once - when Brooke & Thorne were making love in the back bedroom. #3 - She faked a "heart attack" Plus many more incidents. So WHY did they have to bring up Brooke having one "nervous breakdown" before - BUT YET Stephanie's record is "squeeky clean" with Dorothy! Brooke may have slept around a lot, but she did not deserve what happened to her! |
Revasfan![]() |
If it weren't for Ridge the kids would have been creamated. |
JAmy![]() |
Nasty old Hag, go and mind ur own son. |
missbrooke![]() |
for me i have to blame brooke for telling her sister she was pulling up the street. yes nudonna should have waited until brooke came through the door. but the lighter incident? that was brooke and nicky's fault there. |
1Sandy![]() |
Quote missbrooke: for me i have to blame brooke for telling her sister she was pulling up the street. yes nudonna should have waited until brooke came through the door. but the lighter incident? that was brooke and nicky's fault there. Yes - but in all reality I say 99% of households have either lighters or matches in their homes. Its up to the parents to "tell and teach" their children at a VERY young age NOT TO PLAY WITH MATCHES! Nick's lighter fell out of his pocket - by accident! He did not mean it. Yet Hope knew it was wrong and so did RJ - they both said it before she lit the candle. She just wanted to have a candle for their picnic. Its true they are only children. But don't tell me that EVERYONE & ANYONE that smokes or DOES NOT smoke in their home DOES NOT have a lighter or matches??? My husband & I DO NOT SMOKE - but when my relatives come over I take out an ashtray for them. I also have in the way back of one of our drawers matches - in case the lights go out for candles. My children are well aware and KNOW NEVER TO GO NEAR THEM or even touch a smelly old ashtray. But again - I have friends who have younger children - show smoke around them. That Dorothy social worker said it so stupid like: "You should NOT BE smoking around kids". Come on now - you ask half the country: If a spouse or other relative does smoke - they probably do in fornt of children. My relatives do. They bring their own lighters. On this show - it was GOOD to show viwers HOW DANGEROUS it is too touch or play with a lighter. But I personally DO NOT FEEL LIKE it was Nick's fault. Just curiosity from Hope and an accident. Even though B&B writers might have shown how dangerous it is for viwers. How many viwers are actually kids of this show? The lighter issue was an accident and no one'e fault! |
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.