Tell your friends

TELL YOUR FRIENDS

POPULAR SEARCHES

Soaps.com - MESSAGE BOARDS

Soaps Boards :: Democratic no bash part 2

Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.

Democratic no bash part 2

Started by cats meow at 2009/01/29 02:32PM
Latest post: 2009/11/21 01:08PM, Views: 17566, Replies: 1371
« 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 » »| page:
#271   2009/07/05 01:33PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
OspreyGirl
image

Errr...what happened to the Sarah Palin thread? LOL

#272   2009/07/05 01:47PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
cats meow
image

Quote OspreyGirl: Errr...what happened to the Sarah Palin thread? LOL


i was wondering the same thing? but was afraid to ask

#273   2009/07/05 02:15PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
francisfarme...
image

Quote OspreyGirl: Errr...what happened to the Sarah Palin thread? LOL


Last I saw of it cats meow's friend had posted in it that all liberals and progressives were really just communists...after that it soon disappeared from the lounge.

I would just like to address that point...if all liberals and progressives are communists, then all conservatives are nazi's. If you think this is a little strong or just more name calling...try this.
Listen to Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reiley, Rush Limbaugh, and Lou Dobbs talk about "illegals" and immigration, then go and read the writings of Anton Drexler, Gottfried Feder, and Dietrich Echart... you will find many errie similarities.
These three men were the ones who started the early nazi party and recruited adolf hitler.

#274   2009/07/05 03:21PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
Blue 501
image

Quote cats meow: i need someone to explain something to me, why is it the republicians are always lamenting about huge spending by democrats?? didn't obama just inherit a HUGE deficit and weren't the republicians in charge for the last 8 years? i don't think george w inherited those numbers after clinton did he?

BTW, lovin, i think your avi is hilarious


I think the GOP calling the DEM's "big spenders" is an example of the "big lie". Or democrats want to spend on social programs & the republicans want to spend the money killing people

#275   2009/07/05 03:28PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
cats meow
image

quote FF... Last I saw of it cats meow's friend had posted in it that all liberals and progressives were really just communists...after that it soon disappeared from the lounge.

I would just like to address that point...if all liberals and progressives are communists, then all conservatives are nazi's. If you think this is a little strong or just more name calling...try this.
Listen to Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reiley, Rush Limbaugh, and Lou Dobbs talk about "illegals" and immigration, then go and read the writings of Anton Drexler, Gottfried Feder, and Dietrich Echart... you will find many errie similarities.
These three men were the ones who started the early nazi party and recruited adolf hitler.

yes we are friends, and she has a right to express her ideas as long as they are in the correct thread, and for the record, we are total opposites politically, many threads are closed for a number of reasons, you can always start another one

Modified 1 times(s), last time at: 2009/07/05 03:29PM
#276   2009/07/05 03:29PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
Blue 501
image

Quote luvinthesoaps: mediamatters.org/items/200902110018

In recent discussions of the economic recovery package supported by President Obama, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh have repeatedly claimed that President Reagan's tax cuts were responsible for ending the recession in the early 1980s, suggesting that tax cuts, and not government spending, would be the most effective policy to end the current recession. However, several economists have stated that while fiscal policy had some impact during that period, in the words of an August 1983 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report, "[l]ower interest rates after mid-1982 permitted the recovery to begin." Contrary to Limbaugh and Hannity's suggestion that policies implemented under Reagan would be effective at fighting the current recession, as Nobel laureate Paul Krugman has noted: "Right now, the [federal funds] interest rate is zero. The Fed[eral Reserve] can't rescue us this time, and that's why we can't do the things we did in the '80s."

The recession to which Hannity and Limbaugh referred began in July 1981 and ended in November 1982. The federal funds rate peaked at 20 percent in late May 1981 and dropped to 9.5 percent by mid-October 1982, while the discount rate peaked at 14 percent in early May 1981 and dropped to 9.5 percent in mid-October 1982.

Discussing the economic recovery plan on the February 9 edition of Fox News' On the Record, Hannity stated, "[W]e do have an example that did work. This -- and by the way, this is not the worst economy since the Great Depression. Ronald Reagan had 21.5 percent interest rates he inherited. ... [I]nflation was rampant. Unemployment -- we had lost 10 million new jobs. We have experienced tough economic times. His answer was to drop the top marginal rates to 70 to 28 percent." Hannity claimed that because of Reagan's tax cuts, "We created 21 million new jobs, doubled revenues to the government, and we had the longest period of peacetime economic growth in American history," adding: "That is my answer. Go give the money to the American people."

On January 30, Limbaugh made a similar claim in response to the assertion by CNN chief business correspondent Ali Velshi that "[t]his is not the economy that Ronald Reagan ever saw. We have not seen anything like this in our lifetime. Anybody who tells you this is how it works is lying," Limbaugh said: "[I]n 1986, GDP was down over 6 percent. We were in a recession. What was the centerpiece of Mr. Reagan's economic recovery plan, Mr. Velshi? Let me spell it for you: T-A-X-space-C-U-T-S." Limbaugh continued: "When Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, the top marginal tax rate, Mr. Velshi, was 70 percent. When Ronald Reagan left office in 1989, the top marginal tax rate was 28 percent. The only way you can say the tax cuts didn't lift us out of a recession is if you want to lie like Bill Clinton did and claim that the '80s were the worst economy in the last 50 years. But you go back, you look at the prosperity that was created by those tax cuts throughout this country, look at the prosperity that was created through the '90s that Bill Clinton got to claim the credit for."

However, many economists credit the Federal Reserve's reduction of key interest rates with initiating the recovery from the 1981-82 recession -- a change in monetary policy that is not currently available. For example, the August 1983 CBO report, titled "The Economic and Budget Outlook: An Update," concluded that "[l]ower interest rates after mid-1982 permitted the recovery to begin":


I seem to remember that Reagan gave a tax cut but took away most of the deductions we middle class folks could use. Wasn't it during his administration that it began that you could only deduct medical expenses that were over 7.5% of your income? And THEN I think he quietly raised the taxes again.

#277   2009/07/05 03:31PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
Blue 501
image

Quote cats meow: the last 8 years were the worst we have had in my lifetime, no republician seems to remember that, blaming the dems and obama for everything and he hasn't been in office a month


Yes, and they just get mad if you remind them they had it all their way for 8 years and now look.

#278   2009/07/05 03:33PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
wannazach
image

Quote Blue 501:
Quote cats meow: the last 8 years were the worst we have had in my lifetime, no republician seems to remember that, blaming the dems and obama for everything and he hasn't been in office a month


Yes, and they just get mad if you remind them they had it all their way for 8 years and now look.




ITA!!!

#279   2009/07/05 03:39PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
Blue 501
image

sorry, I was posting on old messages.
The last message I saw on the Palin thread was someone complaining about getting reported for her post & asking that people respect her opinions. I then replied that I thought it was disgusting that people who could not hold their own in an argument liked to resort to reporting others. Boom. They blew up the site and every message was gone. Not sure what messages were posted after mine. It was getting a little hot but no more so than any editorial page in the country.

#280   2009/07/05 03:41PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
francisfarme...
image

Quote cats meow: quote FF... Last I saw of it cats meow's friend had posted in it that all liberals and progressives were really just communists...after that it soon disappeared from the lounge.

I would just like to address that point...if all liberals and progressives are communists, then all conservatives are nazi's. If you think this is a little strong or just more name calling...try this.
Listen to Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reiley, Rush Limbaugh, and Lou Dobbs talk about "illegals" and immigration, then go and read the writings of Anton Drexler, Gottfried Feder, and Dietrich Echart... you will find many errie similarities.
These three men were the ones who started the early nazi party and recruited adolf hitler.

yes we are friends, and she has a right to express her ideas as long as they are in the correct thread, and for the record, we are total opposites politically, many threads are closed for a number of reasons, you can always start another one


You keep trying to make everything I post about you. Once again you have missed the point of the post:
"I would just like to address that point...if all liberals and progressives are communists, then all conservatives are nazi's. If you think this is a little strong or just more name calling...try this.
Listen to Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reiley, Rush Limbaugh, and Lou Dobbs talk about "illegals" and immigration, then go and read the writings of Anton Drexler, Gottfried Feder, and Dietrich Echart... you will find many errie similarities.
These three men were the ones who started the early nazi party and recruited adolf hitler."

This being the point of my post...not you CM. Believe me, when I come on here you are the last thing on my mind.

#281   2009/07/05 04:05PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
cats meow
image

thank you for clearing that up, i get so confused sometimes

#282   2009/07/05 04:25PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
gommie
image

Quote Blue 501:
Quote luvinthesoaps: mediamatters.org/items/200902110018

In recent discussions of the economic recovery package supported by President Obama, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh have repeatedly claimed that President Reagan's tax cuts were responsible for ending the recession in the early 1980s, suggesting that tax cuts, and not government spending, would be the most effective policy to end the current recession. However, several economists have stated that while fiscal policy had some impact during that period, in the words of an August 1983 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report, "[l]ower interest rates after mid-1982 permitted the recovery to begin." Contrary to Limbaugh and Hannity's suggestion that policies implemented under Reagan would be effective at fighting the current recession, as Nobel laureate Paul Krugman has noted: "Right now, the [federal funds] interest rate is zero. The Fed[eral Reserve] can't rescue us this time, and that's why we can't do the things we did in the '80s."

The recession to which Hannity and Limbaugh referred began in July 1981 and ended in November 1982. The federal funds rate peaked at 20 percent in late May 1981 and dropped to 9.5 percent by mid-October 1982, while the discount rate peaked at 14 percent in early May 1981 and dropped to 9.5 percent in mid-October 1982.

Discussing the economic recovery plan on the February 9 edition of Fox News' On the Record, Hannity stated, "[W]e do have an example that did work. This -- and by the way, this is not the worst economy since the Great Depression. Ronald Reagan had 21.5 percent interest rates he inherited. ... [I]nflation was rampant. Unemployment -- we had lost 10 million new jobs. We have experienced tough economic times. His answer was to drop the top marginal rates to 70 to 28 percent." Hannity claimed that because of Reagan's tax cuts, "We created 21 million new jobs, doubled revenues to the government, and we had the longest period of peacetime economic growth in American history," adding: "That is my answer. Go give the money to the American people."

On January 30, Limbaugh made a similar claim in response to the assertion by CNN chief business correspondent Ali Velshi that "[t]his is not the economy that Ronald Reagan ever saw. We have not seen anything like this in our lifetime. Anybody who tells you this is how it works is lying," Limbaugh said: "[I]n 1986, GDP was down over 6 percent. We were in a recession. What was the centerpiece of Mr. Reagan's economic recovery plan, Mr. Velshi? Let me spell it for you: T-A-X-space-C-U-T-S." Limbaugh continued: "When Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, the top marginal tax rate, Mr. Velshi, was 70 percent. When Ronald Reagan left office in 1989, the top marginal tax rate was 28 percent. The only way you can say the tax cuts didn't lift us out of a recession is if you want to lie like Bill Clinton did and claim that the '80s were the worst economy in the last 50 years. But you go back, you look at the prosperity that was created by those tax cuts throughout this country, look at the prosperity that was created through the '90s that Bill Clinton got to claim the credit for."

However, many economists credit the Federal Reserve's reduction of key interest rates with initiating the recovery from the 1981-82 recession -- a change in monetary policy that is not currently available. For example, the August 1983 CBO report, titled "The Economic and Budget Outlook: An Update," concluded that "[l]ower interest rates after mid-1982 permitted the recovery to begin":


I seem to remember that Reagan gave a tax cut but took away most of the deductions we middle class folks could use. Wasn't it during his administration that it began that you could only deduct medical expenses that were over 7.5% of your income? And THEN I think he quietly raised the taxes again.



I am going to respond to this in the republican thread--I don't think I am allowed to do it here----

#283   2009/07/05 04:43PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
Eppy
image

I'm at the point where I don't want to post in ANY political thread. Not that I don't have opinions, but....I also have friends here also who are the complete opposite in their political phylosophy. The best way to lose a friend is to engage in arguments about politics and religion. As far as I'm concerned, Rush Limbaugh, and his ilk already mentioned, are hot-air wind-bags, and totally in love with the sound of their own voice. They are so impresssed with themselves, they care not WHAT misinformation they spew as long as they can get a few like-minded people to genuflect at their feet!!

#284   2009/07/05 04:46PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
wannazach
image

Quote Eppy: I'm at the point where I don't want to post in ANY political thread. Not that I don't have opinions, but....I also have friends here also who are the complete opposite in their political phylosophy. The best way to lose a friend is to engage in arguments about politics and religion. As far as I'm concerned, Rush Limbaugh, and his ilk already mentioned, are hot-air wind-bags, and totally in love with the sound of their own voice. They are so impresssed with themselves, they care not WHAT misinformation they spew as long as they can get a few like-minded people to genuflect at their feet!!


You got that right!

#285   2009/07/05 05:12PM
Re: Democratic no bash part 2
gommie
image

Quote Eppy: I'm at the point where I don't want to post in ANY political thread. Not that I don't have opinions, but....I also have friends here also who are the complete opposite in their political phylosophy. The best way to lose a friend is to engage in arguments about politics and religion. As far as I'm concerned, Rush Limbaugh, and his ilk already mentioned, are hot-air wind-bags, and totally in love with the sound of their own voice. They are so impresssed with themselves, they care not WHAT misinformation they spew as long as they can get a few like-minded people to genuflect at their feet!!



It really is pointless- we are not going to change each others minds and opinions-- time will maybe do that - who knows-- if we can't discuss politics and remain friends then best to not discuss it- politics is an ever changing arrangement- thank goodness- friends are the staple....

« 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 » »| page:

Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.

« Go back to topic list