|
|
Soaps Boards :: Healthcare reform
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
rei1![]() |
I posted this in the Republican thread, but I think this is worthy of discussion. Set aside the abortion issue because I think I know what many posters feel. My question is more toward the healthcare reform and how it will effect the working class. |
cats meow![]() |
good morning rei1, i was under the impression the public insurance would only be for those who don't have insurance and those that do, keep what they have, have things changed? |
Eppy![]() |
Yes, health care costs a lot whether this new health care bill passes or not. It costs the American taxpayer alot regardless - in higher premiums, excluding the existing insured, and refusing insurance to others, and higher state taxes to provide medicaid to the low income. Those who are excluded cause hospital fees to skyrocket in order to compensate for non-payers using expensive ER's for routine family medical needs, and so on. The taxpayer pays for all that too. Might as well shift that to a plan that will cover everyone and insure competition among insurance companies. We must not forget, the insured will be paying premiums, deductibles and shares of cost - the same as everyone else does when enrolled in a plan. |
daisyjo![]() |
I just wish President Obama had fought harder for true reform. It seems he was so worried about bipartisanship and trying to get some Republican votes that he backed off real reform ( real public option, etc). The Republicans have shown where they stand (no where) time and time again. We can only hope the Senate learns something from the House vote and forgets about the Republicans and put through a strong bill that will bring about real reform. Bipatisanship is great but when the other party continuously votes no just for the sake of disageeing and offers no real alternatives (and haven't for the past 8 years) it is time to go forward w/out them. |
rei1![]() |
Quote cats meow: good morning rei1, i was under the impression the public insurance would only be for those who don't have insurance and those that do, keep what they have, have things changed? i am not being sarcastic at all(i think you already know that), i really want to know, thanks Hi Cats..I heard it said over and over again that people that presently have insurance will be able to keep it, but looking at it on the employers side, the fine that employers will have to pay is lower than the amount that they put into peoples healthcare. It just stands to make sence that employers will actually be saving money to drop the coverage. I could be wrong, there are alot of different opinions as to what exactly will happen. I am 100% for competition and if this "Public Option" plan forses that competition then that may not be such a bad thing. I think alot of medical services are outrageously priced. I had to take my daughter to the ER for a bump on the head...it looked really bad, anyway she saw a doc and he looked with his eye's, no x-ray, no tests, nothing...and our insurance was billed over $1000.00, we had to pay a deductible on top of that...If we went to the peditricians office they would have billed my insurance $40 and our copay would have been $20. I of course was very concerned about my daughter and it also happened on a weekend, so the option to see the pediatrician was out. Something needs to be done...status quo isn't helping anyone. Even though we have insurance...we struggle to pay everything. America needs a break! I agree with Eppy on that, we are already paying sooo much in taxes. I just wish I felt more confident about the "Public Option" I guess time will tell. |
cats meow![]() |
eppy, i thought when in came down to the vote, all the republicians,100% voted no, who voted yes, it amazes me how united the republicians are on every issue, we should take a page out of their play book, and i totally agree with you daisyjo,obama should have been tougher, he should have said i want to work with everyone, however if you don't that is fine, we have the majority and i intend to use that |
cats meow![]() |
Quote rei1: Quote cats meow: good morning rei1, i was under the impression the public insurance would only be for those who don't have insurance and those that do, keep what they have, have things changed? i am not being sarcastic at all(i think you already know that), i really want to know, thanks Hi Cats..I heard it said over and over again that people that presently have insurance will be able to keep it, but looking at it on the employers side, the fine that employers will have to pay is lower than the amount that they put into peoples healthcare. It just stands to make sence that employers will actually be saving money to drop the coverage. I could be wrong, there are alot of different opinions as to what exactly will happen. I am 100% for competition and if this "Public Option" plan forses that competition then that may not be such a bad thing. I think alot of medical services are outrageously priced. I had to take my daughter to the ER for a bump on the head...it looked really bad, anyway she saw a doc and he looked with his eye's, no x-ray, no tests, nothing...and our insurance was billed over $1000.00, we had to pay a deductible on top of that...If we went to the peditricians office they would have billed my insurance $40 and our copay would have been $20. I of course was very concerned about my daughter and it also happened on a weekend, so the option to see the pediatrician was out. Something needs to be done...status quo isn't helping anyone. Even though we have insurance...we struggle to pay everything. America needs a break! I agree with Eppy on that, we are already paying sooo much in taxes. I just wish I felt more confident about the "Public Option" I guess time will tell. sorry rei, i totally missed this post, i don't know anything about the company fines, i thought it was directed at small companies that did not provide insurance, we are all going to have to read the entire bill, and i am sure there will be many interpretations of it, LOL forgot to add, when i had my own business, doing nails, i had a few clients on medicaid,(nice huh?) i can remember one vividly, she suffered from panic attacks, well she didn't own a car, so she always went to the hospital by ambulance, i used to steam when i heard that,and you are absolutely correct, we need to stop paying for crap like that, and we are!!!! that is what so many people don't realize, i honestly believe the public option will help get rid of this abuse |
bigtimesoapfan![]() |
Well since Im already poor Im wondering how much this will screw me over!! I can't afford for another bill to go up!! |
cats meow![]() |
Quote bigtimesoapfan: Well since Im already poor Im wondering how much this will screw me over!! I can't afford for another bill to go up!! do you currently have health insurance? if you don't, you will be able to get it , that's good news, don't you think? |
bigtimesoapfan![]() |
I have it thru work. Ive been there for 4 years when I first started it was $55 every other week(family plan) and $5 for dental and now it's $85 every other week and $5 for dental. I qualify for the states free program but I feel bad to take it from someone who is more needy than I am or my family. 1000+ pages imo leaves alot of ? and loopholes! Only time will tell!! |
lovesit![]() |
Quote Eppy: Yes, health care costs a lot whether this new health care bill passes or not. It costs the American taxpayer alot regardless - in higher premiums, excluding the existing insured, and refusing insurance to others, and higher state taxes to provide medicaid to the low income. Those who are excluded cause hospital fees to skyrocket in order to compensate for non-payers using expensive ER's for routine family medical needs, and so on. The taxpayer pays for all that too. Might as well shift that to a plan that will cover everyone and insure competition among insurance companies. We must not forget, the insured will be paying premiums, deductibles and shares of cost - the same as everyone else does when enrolled in a plan. I can't believe that only one Republican had compassion enough to vote yea for the Healthcare Admendment last night. Apparently compassion can be in short supply when one's campaign contributions are heavily covered by those insurance money-making machines who want to maintain the status quo. And of course, what representive or politician doesn't love his job, the position and all the perks he/she enjoys. They are in each others' pockets so to speak. I doubt it has anything to do with compassion. It probably has more to do with the fact that they are listening to their state's opinions, and know that if they vote based on what they want, instead of the wants of who they represent, they will bo out in 2010 (which is why most Senate Dems will not be voting for it, according to the news this morning). I would have voted no as well, and it has nothing to do with my lack of compassion. There is sustainability to consider, the wants and needs of the American people based on the American people, not on the reps who live in a world most of us could never comprehend. I read an article last week that said lots of people are moving out of New York b/c the taxes there keep rising. Now what do we think is going to happen once this passes? Most don't feel sorry for the rich, but let me tell you, if a nation keeps losing its rich folk, its not hard to see what it becomes - of course, we're already almost there, so why stop now? All I really know is I'm already scheduling my check ups now, before my company seizes the opportunity to pay the lesser fine of no longer allowing me insurance and I'm forced to wait in line with the other baxillion people who will now be insured. |
Eppy![]() |
Sorry, but I fail to make the connection between the ordinary guy having the opportunity to buy into an insurance plan and being assured he will not be excluded or dropped from the plan, to losing all the rich people in this country. Singles who make over $500,000.00 per year and married couples who make over $1,000,000.00 per year will be the ones who will see an increase in taxes. I doubt that an increase in their taxes would make them poor. I feel sorrier for the guy who can't get insurance and finds it necessary to lose his savings or home or personal belongings to pay for medical bills and then find himself in bankruptcy and be sick, ill or disabled on top of that. Even the rich ones would find that hard to deal with if they couldn't get insurance. |
calliope![]() |
This partisanship crap is like herd mentality. Dems think if Obama said it, it must be the most wonderful thing ever, Reps think if Obama said it it must be wrong. I will bet that if any of those people voted what their states want it would not have passed. Why all the party stuff? I hate it...can't those in office sit down and listen to the people and come together with something? |
cats meow![]() |
some of you may have forgotten, another part of the bill will not allow current insurance companies to deny people coverage because of what they define as a pre existing condition, they won't be able to drop you when you get sick, this is a huge benefit for all of us, and remember, all of us will not be paying for emergency room visits for the un insured |
lovesit![]() |
Eppy - |
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.