Tell your friends

TELL YOUR FRIENDS

POPULAR SEARCHES

Soaps.com - MESSAGE BOARDS

Soaps Boards :: BY NO MEANS DO I MEAN ANY DISREPECT HERE, I LOVED MICHAEL. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT WHAT'S GOING...

Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.

BY NO MEANS DO I MEAN ANY DISREPECT HERE, I LOVED MICHAEL. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON NOW?

Started by sandi314 at 2009/06/27 01:16PM
Latest post: 2009/07/04 06:00PM, Views: 519, Replies: 34
« 1 2 3 page:
#21   2009/07/01 09:14PM
Re: BY NO MEANS DO I MEAN ANY DISREPECT HERE, I LOVED MICHAEL. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT WHAT'S...
rei1
image

I wonder if "the Will" is even valid, given the recent information that Jackson was not the biological father and he never officially adopted the children..how can he have a say into where they should go? He Legally has no right over those children.


I guess my question is how can a person say where children are to be placed if that person had no biological or legal ties to the children?

I also understand that Love makes a family and those children looked at MJ as there father and loved him..thats all they knew.

#22   2009/07/02 08:12AM
Re: BY NO MEANS DO I MEAN ANY DISREPECT HERE, I LOVED MICHAEL. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT WHAT'S...
bigtimesoapfan
image

Quote rei1: I wonder if "the Will" is even valid, given the recent information that Jackson was not the biological father and he never officially adopted the children..how can he have a say into where they should go? He Legally has no right over those children.


I guess my question is how can a person say where children are to be placed if that person had no biological or legal ties to the children?

I also understand that Love makes a family and those children looked at MJ as there father and loved him..thats all they knew.


It would set a precident!! His name isn't on the childrens birth certificates? If my understanding is correct whoever is on that is the parents(and legal guardian) unless otherwise determined by the courts. when I had my first child and wasn't married he(now hubby) wanted to be on the Bc and by doing that I was told we both had custody of him(alot of parents don't know this so when they split from their partner, the mom usually takes the kids. But in actuality they have Joint custody!!

#23   2009/07/02 09:11AM
Re: BY NO MEANS DO I MEAN ANY DISREPECT HERE, I LOVED MICHAEL. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT WHAT'S...
OspreyGirl
image

Quote Sunnydaz: Has anyone seen or heard LaToya's name since Michael died. I'm just wondering. I've read many articles, watched lots of coverage on tv but havent heard a word about her.



LaToya was last seen rushing to the hospital to get to Michael...you can find photos of that online.

Also last week, she and Janet went to Michael's house, presumably to pick up some things, and left in a shaded SUV. They were able to gain entry after the cops investigated the scene, I think this happened last Friday/Saturday.

#24   2009/07/04 02:22PM
Re: BY NO MEANS DO I MEAN ANY DISREPECT HERE, I LOVED MICHAEL. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT WHAT'S...
Blue 501
image

Quote alwaysEJ: Ya know, the woman who carried the two oldest kids, Ms. Rowe, may not even be their biological mother...I mean she has always said she was a surrogate who carried them as a favor to Michael, but often surrogates simply carry another woman's child. That would help to explain her disconnect from them. They don't look like her, IMO.


I believe Ms Rowe is the biological mother. The question is, who was the biological father? A sperm donor? I have never actually seen them, except for the famous balcony scene with "Blanket" but from what people are saying, it sounds as if they could not possibly be Michael's. And I think Michael chose to cut her out of any contact with them, regarding it as simply a business transaction. And maybe he was right, depending on her motives (ie did she do it just for the money).

#25   2009/07/04 06:00PM
Re: BY NO MEANS DO I MEAN ANY DISREPECT HERE, I LOVED MICHAEL. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT WHAT'S...
Tammer
image

I saw an interview with Debbie, she stated very clearly that she did NOT want to be a mother. She said she had the children for Michael. Those were her exact words.
I saw a copy of the birth certificates on that interview as well, Michael is named as the father on both.
Regardless, he was married to Debbie at the time of their birth, he is legally their father...biology does not have to play a part in that.
Michael has raised these children through an agreement with his ex, she got a settlement, and again she clearly stated the she did not want to be a mother to them or any other children. She stated that her horses were her children.
I don't think she is a monster, however I do believe when an opportunity arises that she thinks she may "gain" from "kicking up dirt" she does just that.
The children don't know her at all, and they have lost their only parent, what a shame to have to separate them from their little brother!

« 1 2 3 page:

Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.

« Go back to topic list