|
|
Soaps Boards :: Gov't sponsored Health Care
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
cats meow![]() |
does anyone know what kind of health care the people have that are voting on this issue? thanks |
Eppy![]() |
A news report I heard about an hour ago says those making less than 250,000.00 will not have their taxes raised. Who to believe? Reactionaries won't believe it though. |
alwaysEJ![]() |
I cited an article that quotes two of Obama's top advisors who were on TV this weekend & both refused to say that Obama would not, under any circumstances, raise middle class taxes. They basically said all options are on the table. I don't know if he will or not, but if health care is overhauled the way he wants it to be, the money has to come from somewhere. The statements of his advisors may be influenced by the news (article below) that federal tax revenues have seen the biggest drop since 1932. There is no money to pay for what he's proposing. Taking nearly everything the wealthy in this country have will not cover the costs. He will simply redefine 'wealthy' & 'middle class.' Suddenly if you make over $100,000 you'll be wealthy & not 'middle class,' & be slapped with massive tax increases. |
sarahconnor![]() |
Quote alwaysEJ: I cited an article that quotes two of Obama's top advisors who were on TV this weekend & both refused to say that Obama would not, under any circumstances, raise middle class taxes. They basically said all options are on the table. I don't know if he will or not, but if health care is overhauled the way he wants it to be, the money has to come from somewhere. The statements of his advisors may be influenced by the news (article below) that federal tax revenues have seen the biggest drop since 1932. There is no money to pay for what he's proposing. Taking nearly everything the wealthy in this country have will not cover the costs. He will simply redefine 'wealthy' & 'middle class.' Suddenly if you make over $100,000 you'll be wealthy & not 'middle class,' & be slapped with massive tax increases. news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_plummeting_taxes the link you provided has NO mention of any Obama advisor mentioning a possible raise in middle class taxes. what you cited was a fox news talking point. (imagine that) what the article is talking about though is nothing new - it's saying the government is spending more than it's taking in - welcome to 1983! the government will simply borrow more even if it means borrowing from the fed which will simply print more money. social security is screwed and we've known this for some time. the republicans wanted to shift the trust fund out of washington's hands and into wall Street's hands - something which anyone with half a brain would realize as stupid today. the problem is NEITHER SIDE is willing to tell the "senior citizen" voters they can't fund social security as it is today because that's political suicide. perhaps it'd work if the government wasn't already wasting trillions of dollars invading third world nations and bailing out the billionaires on wall street. as for healthcare, in the US we already spend far more per person than any other nation yet we do not get as much bang for the buck as those nations with a single-provider health system. there's two reasons for this - one if everyone was under the same system, the system could dictate terms on a more beneficial scale for its members (i.e. you're buying in bulk so you get a discount) - and the second is it would remove the profit motive from healthcare. HMO's and other health insurance companies waste a great deal of money on administration costs (i.e. executive salaries, board meetings in barbados, corporate jets, etc). i do agree with some conservatives who say we need tort reform to limit healthcare-related lawsuits and this would also happen under a single-payer system (ever try to sue the government?). this is a case where the government could actually save us money by taking on healthcare spending. better than any "stimulus" every could. |
alwaysEJ![]() |
finance.yahoo.com/news/2-Obama-officials-No- |
alwaysEJ![]() |
I don't see how this article: |
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.