|
|
Soaps Boards :: As the World Turns Forum :: I have to comment..........
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
dwebster![]() |
Quote missblondie: I agree with you collett. I don't think that they should show any adult half naked in the bed with a child. It just looks bad no matter what the relationship is. He should have been wearing a shirt or pajamas. He was probably fully clothed under the covers. People making assumptions can be bad. Do you really think he didn't have any clothes on under the covers? There are strict guidelines for children working on television. They are more protected there than they are in their own homes. |
missblondie![]() |
Quote dwebster: Quote missblondie: I agree with you collett. I don't think that they should show any adult half naked in the bed with a child. It just looks bad no matter what the relationship is. He should have been wearing a shirt or pajamas. He was probably fully clothed under the covers. People making assumptions can be bad. Do you really think he didn't have any clothes on under the covers? There are strict guidelines for children working on television. They are more protected there than they are in their own homes. NO, I don't think he was really naked under the covers. I would never think that the people at ATWT would put a child in the bed with a naked man or woman. The discussion is how it appeared on TV. You know like a misunderstanding. |
dwebster![]() |
Quote missblondie: Quote dwebster: Quote missblondie: I agree with you collett. I don't think that they should show any adult half naked in the bed with a child. It just looks bad no matter what the relationship is. He should have been wearing a shirt or pajamas. He was probably fully clothed under the covers. People making assumptions can be bad. Do you really think he didn't have any clothes on under the covers? There are strict guidelines for children working on television. They are more protected there than they are in their own homes. NO, I don't think he was really naked under the covers. I would never think that the people at ATWT would put a child in the bed with a naked man or woman. The discussion is how it appeared on TV. You know like a misunderstanding. The key word is TV. Not real. It should have been a non-issue. If it wasn't an issue we wouldn't be having this discussion. |
missblondie![]() |
Quote dwebster: Quote missblondie: Quote dwebster: Quote missblondie: I agree with you collett. I don't think that they should show any adult half naked in the bed with a child. It just looks bad no matter what the relationship is. He should have been wearing a shirt or pajamas. He was probably fully clothed under the covers. People making assumptions can be bad. Do you really think he didn't have any clothes on under the covers? There are strict guidelines for children working on television. They are more protected there than they are in their own homes. NO, I don't think he was really naked under the covers. I would never think that the people at ATWT would put a child in the bed with a naked man or woman. The discussion is how it appeared on TV. You know like a misunderstanding. The key word is TV. Not real. It should have been a non-issue. If it wasn't an issue we wouldn't be having this discussion. News flash, Nothing on the soap is real, so why do we have a discussion board at all. It's okay for anyone else to get worked up about a storyline or character. The issue is not whether he was "really" naked the issue is that it could have been misconstrued as something else "on the show", by a viewer. |
Collett![]() |
Quote dwebster: Quote missblondie: Quote dwebster: Quote missblondie: I agree with you collett. I don't think that they should show any adult half naked in the bed with a child. It just looks bad no matter what the relationship is. He should have been wearing a shirt or pajamas. He was probably fully clothed under the covers. People making assumptions can be bad. Do you really think he didn't have any clothes on under the covers? There are strict guidelines for children working on television. They are more protected there than they are in their own homes. NO, I don't think he was really naked under the covers. I would never think that the people at ATWT would put a child in the bed with a naked man or woman. The discussion is how it appeared on TV. You know like a misunderstanding. The key word is TV. Not real. It should have been a non-issue. If it wasn't an issue we wouldn't be having this discussion. If we can discuss what's not real then I guess we won't be discussing anything at all. |
Lady53![]() |
Quote missblondie: Quote dwebster: Quote missblondie: Quote dwebster: Quote missblondie: I agree with you collett. I don't think that they should show any adult half naked in the bed with a child. It just looks bad no matter what the relationship is. He should have been wearing a shirt or pajamas. He was probably fully clothed under the covers. People making assumptions can be bad. Do you really think he didn't have any clothes on under the covers? There are strict guidelines for children working on television. They are more protected there than they are in their own homes. NO, I don't think he was really naked under the covers. I would never think that the people at ATWT would put a child in the bed with a naked man or woman. The discussion is how it appeared on TV. You know like a misunderstanding. The key word is TV. Not real. It should have been a non-issue. If it wasn't an issue we wouldn't be having this discussion. News flash, Nothing on the soap is real, so why do we have a discussion board at all. It's okay for anyone else to get worked up about a storyline or character. The issue is not whether he was "really" naked the issue is that it could have been misconstrued as something else "on the show", by a viewer. Did you misconstrue it as something else? Did you think it was something other than what it appeared to be, a little boy asleep in his fathers bed. |
dwebster![]() |
Quote Lady53: Quote missblondie: Quote dwebster: Quote missblondie: Quote dwebster: Quote missblondie: I agree with you collett. I don't think that they should show any adult half naked in the bed with a child. It just looks bad no matter what the relationship is. He should have been wearing a shirt or pajamas. He was probably fully clothed under the covers. People making assumptions can be bad. Do you really think he didn't have any clothes on under the covers? There are strict guidelines for children working on television. They are more protected there than they are in their own homes. NO, I don't think he was really naked under the covers. I would never think that the people at ATWT would put a child in the bed with a naked man or woman. The discussion is how it appeared on TV. You know like a misunderstanding. The key word is TV. Not real. It should have been a non-issue. If it wasn't an issue we wouldn't be having this discussion. News flash, Nothing on the soap is real, so why do we have a discussion board at all. It's okay for anyone else to get worked up about a storyline or character. The issue is not whether he was "really" naked the issue is that it could have been misconstrued as something else "on the show", by a viewer. Did you misconstrue it as something else? Did you think it was something other than what it appeared to be, a little boy asleep in his fathers bed. That is what it was. Just a little boy asleep in his father's bed instead of making something more to it than what it was. Nothing! |
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.