|
|
Soaps Boards :: As the World Turns Forum :: I've had it. Kidnapping is a Federal Law too
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
BiRanger![]() |
I have had with this lawless show. No more. As a cop I can no longer watch such a constant joke. Making a joke of law this is as bad a Reno 911 |
Valinator1![]() |
Quote BiRanger: I have had with this lawless show. No more. As a cop I can no longer watch such a constant joke. Making a joke of law this is as bad a Reno 911 In real life Paul would be arrested. Poor Dusty he means well, but he's mixing in too much. I think they should of locked up Paul and throw away the key. I mean look at Craig he's tried to kill Paul, tried to run over Rosanne and much more and nothing ever happens to him or anyone else for that matter. Well I guess you just got to take the good w/the bad. Afterall it's just a soap. If it was too realistic it might be too boring. |
calliope![]() |
But if Meg said she gave him permission to take Eliza on a little trip...even if they knew she was lying, how could they arrest him? The mother said he could take her, she just forgot! |
Valinator1![]() |
Quote calliope: But if Meg said she gave him permission to take Eliza on a little trip...even if they knew she was lying, how could they arrest him? The mother said he could take her, she just forgot! That is true, but on the other hand Bonnie, and Dusty were witnesses. Dusty is right Paul is gonna do this again... |
NoNuke4me![]() |
calliope, you are right if Meg says she gave him permission then they can't do anything to Paul, but they can arrest Meg for filing a false police report and force her to decide if she wants to go to jail or if she wants Paul to go to jail. Also the State could press charges and call Meg as a witness and she would have to decide whether to perjure herself or tell the truth. |
LTsoapfan![]() |
The whole show and the writing is terrible - it is going to be cancelled like GL if this keeps up!!! Unbelievable crap... |
SamuraiJediS...![]() |
Quote LTsoapfan: The whole show and the writing is terrible - it is going to be cancelled like GL if this keeps up!!! Unbelievable crap... agreed |
hello goodbye![]() |
How could it be considered kidnapping, when you have custody??????????????? |
Tammer![]() |
Originally Paul did have custody when he left. |
I_love_Gwena...![]() |
Quote BiRanger: I have had with this lawless show. No more. As a cop I can no longer watch such a constant joke. Making a joke of law this is as bad a Reno 911 How good would the show be if everyone went to jail? Meg, Dusty, Craig, Carly, Jack, Casey, Brad, Katie, Henry…I mean practically everyone on the show could have gone to jail at one point or another. So all in all them getting away with the wicked deeds is what keeps the show going. |
BiRanger![]() |
Quote Valinator1: Quote BiRanger: I have had with this lawless show. No more. As a cop I can no longer watch such a constant joke. Making a joke of law this is as bad a Reno 911 In real life Paul would be arrested. Poor Dusty he means well, but he's mixing in too much. I think they should of locked up Paul and throw away the key. I mean look at Craig he's tried to kill Paul, tried to run over Rosanne and much more and nothing ever happens to him or anyone else for that matter. Well I guess you just got to take the good w/the bad. Afterall it's just a soap. If it was too realistic it might be too boring. Points well taken and thanks, but can not the police here just once do it right? But you have a most valid point is is a soap; that said their main rule is this police department is destined to do no right. |
NoNuke4me![]() |
There are these new things called financial records where you can see how much money people take out of their bank accounts, and there are these things called security cameras that catch images of people spending huge sums of money in places like motels, airports, clothing stores and other places. It wouldn't take much to show a babysitter with no money all of sudden starts spending lots of money and the amount she is spending just happens to match the amount withdrawn from Paul's account, not to mention Meg doesn't have enough money for her own place and is living at home with her mom so I doubt she is buying anyone off. |
Tammer![]() |
Quote NoNuke4me: There are these new things called financial records where you can see how much money people take out of their bank accounts, and there are these things called security cameras that catch images of people spending huge sums of money in places like motels, airports, clothing stores and other places. It wouldn't take much to show a babysitter with no money all of sudden starts spending lots of money and the amount she is spending just happens to match the amount withdrawn from Paul's account, not to mention Meg doesn't have enough money for her own place and is living at home with her mom so I doubt she is buying anyone off. The police put out an amber alert and had a manhunt going on in search of Paul because he was breaking the law once the judge resend the custody order and gave custody back to Meg and Paul was made aware of this by Meg and Barbara. If you avoid the law to keep from finding out your breaking the law that doesn't make it any less illegal. Yes you are right about the money however, Paul probably wouldn't be that stupid for them to trace those funds back to him. Meg may be poor but an argument Paul could have is Captain save a ho!! He could easily prove that Dusty is out to get him and would do anything(which he would) to nail Paul. As for the kidnapping, I still say it's bogus!! He wasn't kidnapping when he left, why(and again in real life this would not happen) would a judge ever believe Meg & Dusty and their story. Paul was not breaking the law when he left. I think it would take a lot more than them and a babysitter to prove any wrong doing. I know what Paul did was wrong, but Meg could have avoided this by not trying to keep Eliza's Dad out of her life. |
NoNuke4me![]() |
How about phone records? |
Tammer![]() |
Quote NoNuke4me: How about phone records? There there is Damian who over heard Paul talking to the babysitter on the phone. So you have the babysitter coming forward, Damian colaborating her story with what he heard Paul saying. What I have a problem with is how people excuse Paul breaking the law and blame Meg for everything and she hasn't broken law one where this entire Eliza fight is concerned. The Police don't put out Amber alerts because someone might have been kidnapped. Wasn't Paul using a disposable phone? That's what I heard him say. I don't see anyone blaming Meg for everything, I am simply saying she had a hand in this whole mess...there is no denying that! She could have made an agreement with Paul for shared custody. What I was saying about the police is that in the real world, I'm pretty sure there would have to be more evidence surrounding the babysitter pay off. One can't simply take the word of the distraught mother and her rich friend. There is no excuse for Paul breaking the law, I didn't see anyone making that argument..just that Meg could have avoided it. There is no doubt what Paul did to gain custody was against the law. |
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.