|
|
Soaps Boards :: As the World Turns Forum :: Carly Called It (Monday, 5/4 Episode)
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
keytonblows![]() |
Quote Bryceson: Quote NoNuke4me: Quote Bryceson: I kind of hope Jack does frame Craig for this. It would be an interesting storyline for Jack. Not to mention I would love to watch the saint fall from grace and this would makes him no better than Craig and finally Carly can hold his mistakes over his head for the next several years. Not to mention it would be fun to watch Margo fire his A$$!!!!! Is there in rock solid evidence that eliminates the possibility of Craig being the killer? Where did he go after he gave Parker the $50K? I'm not going to rule out the possibility of Craig's involvement. I don't think Jack putting Craig behind bars would ever come close to bringing Jack down to Craig's level, Jack has never kidnapped anyone or murdered anyone so Jack has quite a way to go before he could ever touch Craig on the slime ball level. You can never rule out Craig's involvement in any thing. That being said I don't think Jack is even looking for anyone else. He has tried and convicted Craig not because of evidence but because he can't stand Craig. Jack’s job is to protect and serve. So if he sets Craig up to take the fall on this/or he is to close minded to even look for other suspects. If Jack allows Craig to take the fall for this then IMO he has lowered himself much further than Craig could ever go. Despite how he feels about Craig and his involvement with Carly and his children Jacks job is to find evidence that leads to the real killer and the fact that he didn’t want to even hear from Parker makes me think he doesn’t really care who the real killer is he wants to punish Craig. So in your opinion Jack putting away a known criminal by bending the rules is worst than being a borderline terrorist? That is insane, Jack is protecting the people by putting away Craig using any means at his disposal. Craig has murdered, Craig has kidnapped, Craig has blackmailed and he has no moral compass. I will be the first to stand up and applaud Jack if he is able to remove Craig from society. |
Tammer![]() |
Quote NoNuke4me: Quote Bryceson: I kind of hope Jack does frame Craig for this. It would be an interesting storyline for Jack. Not to mention I would love to watch the saint fall from grace and this would makes him no better than Craig and finally Carly can hold his mistakes over his head for the next several years. Not to mention it would be fun to watch Margo fire his A$$!!!!! Is there in rock solid evidence that eliminates the possibility of Craig being the killer? Where did he go after he gave Parker the $50K? I'm not going to rule out the possibility of Craig's involvement. I don't think Jack putting Craig behind bars would ever come close to bringing Jack down to Craig's level, Jack has never kidnapped anyone or murdered anyone so Jack has quite a way to go before he could ever touch Craig on the slime ball level. Yes there is! Have you not heard Lucy talking to Dusty? She is the one that was doing the smuggling. Ok it wasn't her fault the men she was dealing with decided to smuggle the guns, but Craig is totally innocent from this. |
Tammer![]() |
Quote keytonblows: Quote Bryceson: Quote NoNuke4me: Quote Bryceson: I kind of hope Jack does frame Craig for this. It would be an interesting storyline for Jack. Not to mention I would love to watch the saint fall from grace and this would makes him no better than Craig and finally Carly can hold his mistakes over his head for the next several years. Not to mention it would be fun to watch Margo fire his A$$!!!!! Is there in rock solid evidence that eliminates the possibility of Craig being the killer? Where did he go after he gave Parker the $50K? I'm not going to rule out the possibility of Craig's involvement. I don't think Jack putting Craig behind bars would ever come close to bringing Jack down to Craig's level, Jack has never kidnapped anyone or murdered anyone so Jack has quite a way to go before he could ever touch Craig on the slime ball level. You can never rule out Craig's involvement in any thing. That being said I don't think Jack is even looking for anyone else. He has tried and convicted Craig not because of evidence but because he can't stand Craig. Jack’s job is to protect and serve. So if he sets Craig up to take the fall on this/or he is to close minded to even look for other suspects. If Jack allows Craig to take the fall for this then IMO he has lowered himself much further than Craig could ever go. Despite how he feels about Craig and his involvement with Carly and his children Jacks job is to find evidence that leads to the real killer and the fact that he didn’t want to even hear from Parker makes me think he doesn’t really care who the real killer is he wants to punish Craig. So in your opinion Jack putting away a known criminal by bending the rules is worst than being a borderline terrorist? That is insane, Jack is protecting the people by putting away Craig using any means at his disposal. Craig has murdered, Craig has kidnapped, Craig has blackmailed and he has no moral compass. I will be the first to stand up and applaud Jack if he is able to remove Craig from society. A lie, is a lie, is a lie...if Jack lies he is abusing his power. If Jack puts Craig away for something he knows he didn't do, that is an obstruction of justice. Jack has a duty to see the evidence and apply to proper procedures to it. He is not doing that. Jack refuses to see what's in front of his face, and he is trying to manufacture evidence. Jack is a borderline hypocrite and if he pushes any further, he will be like Bryceson said... far lower than Craig. |
keytonblows![]() |
Quote Tammer: Quote NoNuke4me: Quote Bryceson: I kind of hope Jack does frame Craig for this. It would be an interesting storyline for Jack. Not to mention I would love to watch the saint fall from grace and this would makes him no better than Craig and finally Carly can hold his mistakes over his head for the next several years. Not to mention it would be fun to watch Margo fire his A$$!!!!! Is there in rock solid evidence that eliminates the possibility of Craig being the killer? Where did he go after he gave Parker the $50K? I'm not going to rule out the possibility of Craig's involvement. I don't think Jack putting Craig behind bars would ever come close to bringing Jack down to Craig's level, Jack has never kidnapped anyone or murdered anyone so Jack has quite a way to go before he could ever touch Craig on the slime ball level. Yes there is! Have you not heard Lucy talking to Dusty? She is the one that was doing the smuggling. Ok it wasn't her fault the men she was dealing with decided to smuggle the guns, but Craig is totally innocent from this. So you’re saying Lucy knows who is smuggling the guns and who killed the dock worker beyond a shadow of a doubt? So if Lucy knows beyond a shadow of a doubt who killed the guy how come she hasn't come forward with that info or figured out away to make an anonymous tip to the cops?? Fact is Lucy doesn't know for a fact that Craig didn't murder the guy. |
keytonblows![]() |
Quote Tammer: Quote keytonblows: Quote Bryceson: Quote NoNuke4me: Quote Bryceson: I kind of hope Jack does frame Craig for this. It would be an interesting storyline for Jack. Not to mention I would love to watch the saint fall from grace and this would makes him no better than Craig and finally Carly can hold his mistakes over his head for the next several years. Not to mention it would be fun to watch Margo fire his A$$!!!!! Is there in rock solid evidence that eliminates the possibility of Craig being the killer? Where did he go after he gave Parker the $50K? I'm not going to rule out the possibility of Craig's involvement. I don't think Jack putting Craig behind bars would ever come close to bringing Jack down to Craig's level, Jack has never kidnapped anyone or murdered anyone so Jack has quite a way to go before he could ever touch Craig on the slime ball level. You can never rule out Craig's involvement in any thing. That being said I don't think Jack is even looking for anyone else. He has tried and convicted Craig not because of evidence but because he can't stand Craig. Jack’s job is to protect and serve. So if he sets Craig up to take the fall on this/or he is to close minded to even look for other suspects. If Jack allows Craig to take the fall for this then IMO he has lowered himself much further than Craig could ever go. Despite how he feels about Craig and his involvement with Carly and his children Jacks job is to find evidence that leads to the real killer and the fact that he didn’t want to even hear from Parker makes me think he doesn’t really care who the real killer is he wants to punish Craig. So in your opinion Jack putting away a known criminal by bending the rules is worst than being a borderline terrorist? That is insane, Jack is protecting the people by putting away Craig using any means at his disposal. Craig has murdered, Craig has kidnapped, Craig has blackmailed and he has no moral compass. I will be the first to stand up and applaud Jack if he is able to remove Craig from society. A lie, is a lie, is a lie...if Jack lies he is abusing his power. If Jack puts Craig away for something he knows he didn't do, that is an obstruction of justice. Jack has a duty to see the evidence and apply to proper procedures to it. He is not doing that. Jack refuses to see what's in front of his face, and he is trying to manufacture evidence. Jack is a borderline hypocrite and if he pushes any further, he will be like Bryceson said... far lower than Craig. So what is the penalty for obstruction of justice or lying or manufacturing evidence? What is the penalty for Kidnapping, attempted murder and for Murder? I'm not a philidelphia lawyer, but I think the penalty for Craig's crimes are a little more steep than the crimes Jack would be committing in putting Craig away which really is a crime but doing the human race a favor. This is all for nothing anyway, Jack isn't going to make up evidence, that isn't Jack's style. Jack isn't going to give Craig the benefit of the doubt and I don't blame him for that. |
Bryceson![]() |
For me it is far worse for a police officer to refuse to do his job properly or manufacture evidence to put some one away based on personal feelings. Police officers take an oath part of that oath is “I WILL PRESERVE THE DIGNITY AND WILL RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF ALL INDIVIDUALS “ no where does it say except for the people I don’t like. Jack has been entrusted to uphold the law and the moment he starts to decide who he chooses to do that with in my opinion makes him worse than Craig. |
Kristi (Admin)![]() moderator |
Quote keytonblows: Quote Tammer: Quote NoNuke4me: Quote Bryceson: I kind of hope Jack does frame Craig for this. It would be an interesting storyline for Jack. Not to mention I would love to watch the saint fall from grace and this would makes him no better than Craig and finally Carly can hold his mistakes over his head for the next several years. Not to mention it would be fun to watch Margo fire his A$$!!!!! Is there in rock solid evidence that eliminates the possibility of Craig being the killer? Where did he go after he gave Parker the $50K? I'm not going to rule out the possibility of Craig's involvement. I don't think Jack putting Craig behind bars would ever come close to bringing Jack down to Craig's level, Jack has never kidnapped anyone or murdered anyone so Jack has quite a way to go before he could ever touch Craig on the slime ball level. Yes there is! Have you not heard Lucy talking to Dusty? She is the one that was doing the smuggling. Ok it wasn't her fault the men she was dealing with decided to smuggle the guns, but Craig is totally innocent from this. So you’re saying Lucy knows who is smuggling the guns and who killed the dock worker beyond a shadow of a doubt? So if Lucy knows beyond a shadow of a doubt who killed the guy how come she hasn't come forward with that info or figured out away to make an anonymous tip to the cops?? Fact is Lucy doesn't know for a fact that Craig didn't murder the guy. Yes, Lucy knows ... so does Dusty - it was Fredo. They've both said so to each other. Dusty's manipulating Lucy to keep quiet so he can get custody of Johnny. Craig didn't know there were drugs being smuggled much less guns! He is innocent in this particular instance and for Jack to manufacture evidence puts not only Craig's case at risk but every other case for which Jack was lead investigator. A whole lot of really, really bad criminals could use Jack manufacturing evidence against Craig as a reason their trial verdicts should be overturned ... and a judge would have to do that. |
keytonblows![]() |
Quote Kristi (Admin): Quote keytonblows: Quote Tammer: Quote NoNuke4me: Quote Bryceson: I kind of hope Jack does frame Craig for this. It would be an interesting storyline for Jack. Not to mention I would love to watch the saint fall from grace and this would makes him no better than Craig and finally Carly can hold his mistakes over his head for the next several years. Not to mention it would be fun to watch Margo fire his A$$!!!!! Is there in rock solid evidence that eliminates the possibility of Craig being the killer? Where did he go after he gave Parker the $50K? I'm not going to rule out the possibility of Craig's involvement. I don't think Jack putting Craig behind bars would ever come close to bringing Jack down to Craig's level, Jack has never kidnapped anyone or murdered anyone so Jack has quite a way to go before he could ever touch Craig on the slime ball level. Yes there is! Have you not heard Lucy talking to Dusty? She is the one that was doing the smuggling. Ok it wasn't her fault the men she was dealing with decided to smuggle the guns, but Craig is totally innocent from this. So you’re saying Lucy knows who is smuggling the guns and who killed the dock worker beyond a shadow of a doubt? So if Lucy knows beyond a shadow of a doubt who killed the guy how come she hasn't come forward with that info or figured out away to make an anonymous tip to the cops?? Fact is Lucy doesn't know for a fact that Craig didn't murder the guy. Yes, Lucy knows ... so does Dusty - it was Fredo. They've both said so to each other. Dusty's manipulating Lucy to keep quiet so he can get custody of Johnny. Craig didn't know there were drugs being smuggled much less guns! He is innocent in this particular instance and for Jack to manufacture evidence puts not only Craig's case at risk but every other case for which Jack was lead investigator. A whole lot of really, really bad criminals could use Jack manufacturing evidence against Craig as a reason their trial verdicts should be overturned ... and a judge would have to do that. So Lucy and Dusty were standing there watching Fredo stick the knife into the dock worker? otherwise they assume it was Fredo and assumption is the mother of all f word ups. |
Bryceson![]() |
Quote keytonblows: Quote Kristi (Admin): Quote keytonblows: Quote Tammer: Quote NoNuke4me: Quote Bryceson: I kind of hope Jack does frame Craig for this. It would be an interesting storyline for Jack. Not to mention I would love to watch the saint fall from grace and this would makes him no better than Craig and finally Carly can hold his mistakes over his head for the next several years. Not to mention it would be fun to watch Margo fire his A$$!!!!! Is there in rock solid evidence that eliminates the possibility of Craig being the killer? Where did he go after he gave Parker the $50K? I'm not going to rule out the possibility of Craig's involvement. I don't think Jack putting Craig behind bars would ever come close to bringing Jack down to Craig's level, Jack has never kidnapped anyone or murdered anyone so Jack has quite a way to go before he could ever touch Craig on the slime ball level. Yes there is! Have you not heard Lucy talking to Dusty? She is the one that was doing the smuggling. Ok it wasn't her fault the men she was dealing with decided to smuggle the guns, but Craig is totally innocent from this. So you’re saying Lucy knows who is smuggling the guns and who killed the dock worker beyond a shadow of a doubt? So if Lucy knows beyond a shadow of a doubt who killed the guy how come she hasn't come forward with that info or figured out away to make an anonymous tip to the cops?? Fact is Lucy doesn't know for a fact that Craig didn't murder the guy. Yes, Lucy knows ... so does Dusty - it was Fredo. They've both said so to each other. Dusty's manipulating Lucy to keep quiet so he can get custody of Johnny. Craig didn't know there were drugs being smuggled much less guns! He is innocent in this particular instance and for Jack to manufacture evidence puts not only Craig's case at risk but every other case for which Jack was lead investigator. A whole lot of really, really bad criminals could use Jack manufacturing evidence against Craig as a reason their trial verdicts should be overturned ... and a judge would have to do that. So Lucy and Dusty were standing there watching Fredo stick the knife into the dock worker? otherwise they assume it was Fredo and assumption is the mother of all f word ups. Imo it is irrelevant if Craig did it or not. Jack is not even looking at any one else. He is not doing his job properly. Honestly I haven’t seen much of an investigation at all. The moment he realized it was Craig’s voda shipment that the guns were in he saw an opportunity to get Craig out of his life or rather Carly’s & Parkers life. Who cares if he did, but I’m going to punish him for it anyway. That’s wrong for any one to think that way but especially wrong for a police officer. What I do find funny about this is Jack who lectures on doing the right thing to Carly and Parker and really anyone who will listen is that he looks like a fool right now. Maybe he should listen to his own lecture and do the right thing and actually find out who did it. Also isn't Jack making the assumption that Craig did these crimes. He has no evidence to prove Craig did it so based on your own words Jack is Fing up! |
Kristi (Admin)![]() moderator |
Quote keytonblows: Quote Kristi (Admin): Quote keytonblows: Quote Tammer: Quote NoNuke4me: Quote Bryceson: I kind of hope Jack does frame Craig for this. It would be an interesting storyline for Jack. Not to mention I would love to watch the saint fall from grace and this would makes him no better than Craig and finally Carly can hold his mistakes over his head for the next several years. Not to mention it would be fun to watch Margo fire his A$$!!!!! Is there in rock solid evidence that eliminates the possibility of Craig being the killer? Where did he go after he gave Parker the $50K? I'm not going to rule out the possibility of Craig's involvement. I don't think Jack putting Craig behind bars would ever come close to bringing Jack down to Craig's level, Jack has never kidnapped anyone or murdered anyone so Jack has quite a way to go before he could ever touch Craig on the slime ball level. Yes there is! Have you not heard Lucy talking to Dusty? She is the one that was doing the smuggling. Ok it wasn't her fault the men she was dealing with decided to smuggle the guns, but Craig is totally innocent from this. So you’re saying Lucy knows who is smuggling the guns and who killed the dock worker beyond a shadow of a doubt? So if Lucy knows beyond a shadow of a doubt who killed the guy how come she hasn't come forward with that info or figured out away to make an anonymous tip to the cops?? Fact is Lucy doesn't know for a fact that Craig didn't murder the guy. Yes, Lucy knows ... so does Dusty - it was Fredo. They've both said so to each other. Dusty's manipulating Lucy to keep quiet so he can get custody of Johnny. Craig didn't know there were drugs being smuggled much less guns! He is innocent in this particular instance and for Jack to manufacture evidence puts not only Craig's case at risk but every other case for which Jack was lead investigator. A whole lot of really, really bad criminals could use Jack manufacturing evidence against Craig as a reason their trial verdicts should be overturned ... and a judge would have to do that. So Lucy and Dusty were standing there watching Fredo stick the knife into the dock worker? otherwise they assume it was Fredo and assumption is the mother of all f word ups. Using that logic, Jack could be the killer and using this to frame Craig. I'm not saying Craig is a great guy. Facts are facts and he has done horrible things. The point is that you can't arrest, charge and convict someone on false evidence. Jack is putting his reputation at risk and for what? Jealousy? Anger? He needs to take a step back and really look at the situation - and start looking for the real killer. |
Bryceson![]() |
Quote Kristi (Admin): Quote keytonblows: Quote Kristi (Admin): Quote keytonblows: Quote Tammer: Quote NoNuke4me: Quote Bryceson: I kind of hope Jack does frame Craig for this. It would be an interesting storyline for Jack. Not to mention I would love to watch the saint fall from grace and this would makes him no better than Craig and finally Carly can hold his mistakes over his head for the next several years. Not to mention it would be fun to watch Margo fire his A$$!!!!! Is there in rock solid evidence that eliminates the possibility of Craig being the killer? Where did he go after he gave Parker the $50K? I'm not going to rule out the possibility of Craig's involvement. I don't think Jack putting Craig behind bars would ever come close to bringing Jack down to Craig's level, Jack has never kidnapped anyone or murdered anyone so Jack has quite a way to go before he could ever touch Craig on the slime ball level. Yes there is! Have you not heard Lucy talking to Dusty? She is the one that was doing the smuggling. Ok it wasn't her fault the men she was dealing with decided to smuggle the guns, but Craig is totally innocent from this. So you’re saying Lucy knows who is smuggling the guns and who killed the dock worker beyond a shadow of a doubt? So if Lucy knows beyond a shadow of a doubt who killed the guy how come she hasn't come forward with that info or figured out away to make an anonymous tip to the cops?? Fact is Lucy doesn't know for a fact that Craig didn't murder the guy. Yes, Lucy knows ... so does Dusty - it was Fredo. They've both said so to each other. Dusty's manipulating Lucy to keep quiet so he can get custody of Johnny. Craig didn't know there were drugs being smuggled much less guns! He is innocent in this particular instance and for Jack to manufacture evidence puts not only Craig's case at risk but every other case for which Jack was lead investigator. A whole lot of really, really bad criminals could use Jack manufacturing evidence against Craig as a reason their trial verdicts should be overturned ... and a judge would have to do that. So Lucy and Dusty were standing there watching Fredo stick the knife into the dock worker? otherwise they assume it was Fredo and assumption is the mother of all f word ups. Using that logic, Jack could be the killer and using this to frame Craig. I'm not saying Craig is a great guy. Facts are facts and he has done horrible things. The point is that you can't arrest, charge and convict someone on false evidence. Jack is putting his reputation at risk and for what? Jealousy? Anger? He needs to take a step back and really look at the situation - and start looking for the real killer. Well said Kristi Not to mention with Craig it's only a matter of time before he does commit a crime. Patience Jack patience |
keytonblows![]() |
Fact: The guns were found in the vodka shipments that belong to Craig and possession is 9/10ths of the law. |
Tammer![]() |
Quote keytonblows: Quote Tammer: Quote keytonblows: Quote Bryceson: Quote NoNuke4me: Quote Bryceson: I kind of hope Jack does frame Craig for this. It would be an interesting storyline for Jack. Not to mention I would love to watch the saint fall from grace and this would makes him no better than Craig and finally Carly can hold his mistakes over his head for the next several years. Not to mention it would be fun to watch Margo fire his A$$!!!!! Is there in rock solid evidence that eliminates the possibility of Craig being the killer? Where did he go after he gave Parker the $50K? I'm not going to rule out the possibility of Craig's involvement. I don't think Jack putting Craig behind bars would ever come close to bringing Jack down to Craig's level, Jack has never kidnapped anyone or murdered anyone so Jack has quite a way to go before he could ever touch Craig on the slime ball level. You can never rule out Craig's involvement in any thing. That being said I don't think Jack is even looking for anyone else. He has tried and convicted Craig not because of evidence but because he can't stand Craig. Jack’s job is to protect and serve. So if he sets Craig up to take the fall on this/or he is to close minded to even look for other suspects. If Jack allows Craig to take the fall for this then IMO he has lowered himself much further than Craig could ever go. Despite how he feels about Craig and his involvement with Carly and his children Jacks job is to find evidence that leads to the real killer and the fact that he didn’t want to even hear from Parker makes me think he doesn’t really care who the real killer is he wants to punish Craig. So in your opinion Jack putting away a known criminal by bending the rules is worst than being a borderline terrorist? That is insane, Jack is protecting the people by putting away Craig using any means at his disposal. Craig has murdered, Craig has kidnapped, Craig has blackmailed and he has no moral compass. I will be the first to stand up and applaud Jack if he is able to remove Craig from society. A lie, is a lie, is a lie...if Jack lies he is abusing his power. If Jack puts Craig away for something he knows he didn't do, that is an obstruction of justice. Jack has a duty to see the evidence and apply to proper procedures to it. He is not doing that. Jack refuses to see what's in front of his face, and he is trying to manufacture evidence. Jack is a borderline hypocrite and if he pushes any further, he will be like Bryceson said... far lower than Craig. So what is the penalty for obstruction of justice or lying or manufacturing evidence? What is the penalty for Kidnapping, attempted murder and for Murder? I'm not a philidelphia lawyer, but I think the penalty for Craig's crimes are a little more steep than the crimes Jack would be committing in putting Craig away which really is a crime but doing the human race a favor. This is all for nothing anyway, Jack isn't going to make up evidence, that isn't Jack's style. Jack isn't going to give Craig the benefit of the doubt and I don't blame him for that. You are completely missing the point. |
Tammer![]() |
Quote keytonblows: Fact: The guns were found in the vodka shipments that belong to Craig and possession is 9/10ths of the law. Fact: Craig has no one that can say yes I was with Craig from 3pm to 5pm on this day. Parker was only with him long enough to get the check and go. Fact: the guy worked for Craig Fact: Craig as a criminal history Fact: Jack hasn't created one drop of evidence, he is going by what is there, which is the guy worked for Craig, the guns were in shipments that belong to Craig. What police officer wouldn't suspect Craig?? Even his own sister suspects him. So get off Jack's back, because until some evidence surfaces that will point to someone else being involved Jack is just doing his job. No he isn't! Jack is trying to find something to pin on Craig. The guy worked at the shipping docks..not for Craig. Jack has nothing concrete, and he is avoiding the truth just to keep Craig. Maybe Parker did it..he has been around that dock many times, he isn't exactly stable right now. Who knows, maybe he killed that guy, and the murder lad them to the gun smuggling ring. Hmm, there are TONS of scenarios. Fact is Lucy & Dusty know Craig is innocent, they have stated that. Now Dusty wants to make up evidence to frame Craig. Good job captain save a ho! |
keytonblows![]() |
Quote Tammer: Quote keytonblows: Fact: The guns were found in the vodka shipments that belong to Craig and possession is 9/10ths of the law. Fact: Craig has no one that can say yes I was with Craig from 3pm to 5pm on this day. Parker was only with him long enough to get the check and go. Fact: the guy worked for Craig Fact: Craig as a criminal history Fact: Jack hasn't created one drop of evidence, he is going by what is there, which is the guy worked for Craig, the guns were in shipments that belong to Craig. What police officer wouldn't suspect Craig?? Even his own sister suspects him. So get off Jack's back, because until some evidence surfaces that will point to someone else being involved Jack is just doing his job. No he isn't! Jack is trying to find something to pin on Craig. The guy worked at the shipping docks..not for Craig. Jack has nothing concrete, and he is avoiding the truth just to keep Craig. Maybe Parker did it..he has been around that dock many times, he isn't exactly stable right now. Who knows, maybe he killed that guy, and the murder lad them to the gun smuggling ring. Hmm, there are TONS of scenarios. Fact is Lucy & Dusty know Craig is innocent, they have stated that. Now Dusty wants to make up evidence to frame Craig. Good job captain save a ho! NO LUCY AND DUSTY DON'T KNOW BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T WITNESS THE MURDER AND FREDO DIDN'T CALL THEM AND SAY HEY I KILLED THE GUY, SO SAYING DUSTY AND LUCY KNOW IS NOT TRUE. Now that is said I can go back to regular type, why would any cop not look at Craig as a suspect? give me one good reason, does he have an air tight alibi for the entire span of time the murder took place?? NO, so you have a criminal eliment with no alibi and a direct connection to the shipment the guns were found in and a direct connection to the victum. I'm not saying this is case closed I'm just saying Jack has every right to suspect Craig. |
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.