|
|
Soaps Boards :: All My Children Forum :: Double Standards
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
MissChef![]() |
Not trying to bash anyone for having their favorite characters, but: |
judilee![]() |
i do believe both David and Zach are wrong in what they are doing...... But I still like David and Zach..... so go figure... there is no accounting for taste.. lol.... I guess it is a matter of great acting and wierd reacting...... They are fantasic actors in their roles Zach is more of a likable carachter than David is, but David is written badly and does the best with what he has to work with... I think without the evil Dr Haywire there would be NO SHOW ( pretty much there now according to everyone) I would love to see a good side of David. |
MissChef![]() |
Quote judilee: i do believe both David and Zach are wrong in what they are doing...... But I still like David and Zach..... so go figure... there is no accounting for taste.. lol.... I guess it is a matter of great acting and wierd reacting...... They are fantasic actors in their roles Zach is more of a likable carachter than David is, but David is written badly and does the best with what he has to work with... I think without the evil Dr Haywire there would be NO SHOW ( pretty much there now according to everyone) I would love to see a good side of David. Judilee, See, I'm not bashing people for LIKING David. I just don't get how one can SEE Zach blackmailing Annie into giving custody of Emma to Ryan as being wrong, but can't see that what David is doing is no different. I'm not asking people to hate anybody. Just note that BOTH deeds are just as bad. If people don't like Annie being blackmailed into signing over custody, how can they like what David is doing with Amanda, Jake and Trevor is my question. |
retired fan![]() |
I just wish the writers could write with some continuity. A person would think they could remember what they have written in their s/l ie: David's signed promise that he wouldn't go after Amanda's baby. It's a shame that the writers "Pratt" don't give the fans more credit for having "some intellegence". |
MissChef![]() |
Quote retired fan: I just wish the writers could write with some continuity. A person would think they could remember what they have written in their s/l ie: David's signed promise that he wouldn't go after Amanda's baby. It's a shame that the writers "Pratt" don't give the fans more credit for having "some intellegence". I also like both actors but really don't like the current s/l. Retired, See?? I thought I was the only one who remembered that signed contract that David wouldn't persue custody of Trevor. How is it that David can go above and beyond the law, but damn you to hell if YOU try to get one over on him? People thought Zach was wrong for blackmailing Annie into giving custody to Ryan in exchange for his silence about Richie's murder, but nobody sees fault with David and what he's doing with Amanda and Jake. I like a good villian too, but what David is doing is beyond ridiculous here! |
tami58![]() |
I think that the actor that plays David is really being wasted, he has a lot of potential and I am surprised he hasn't moved on up. |
stargazer08![]() |
Folks its only a story line its not that serious! I love the David character and yes I see where there maybe a double standard but Zach rarely gets called on his bull nor is Ryan, Eric and all the other "saint" like personalities. My loving David has nothing to do with his morals as it does with his flare. The man is delicious! He's cocky, over barring,take charge type of guy who wouldn't like that?! Call me crazy but he's just sexy to me! |
Feie15![]() |
Quote MissChef: Quote retired fan: I just wish the writers could write with some continuity. A person would think they could remember what they have written in their s/l ie: David's signed promise that he wouldn't go after Amanda's baby. It's a shame that the writers "Pratt" don't give the fans more credit for having "some intellegence". I also like both actors but really don't like the current s/l. Retired, See?? I thought I was the only one who remembered that signed contract that David wouldn't persue custody of Trevor. How is it that David can go above and beyond the law, but damn you to hell if YOU try to get one over on him? People thought Zach was wrong for blackmailing Annie into giving custody to Ryan in exchange for his silence about Richie's murder, but nobody sees fault with David and what he's doing with Amanda and Jake. I like a good villian too, but what David is doing is beyond ridiculous here! Really??? Honestly, I have forgotten all about that. I totally have forgotten that Zack blackmail Annie to give Ryan full custody. People are really still talking about that? I don't recall seeing anybody mentioning it. The reason I don't like Zack has nothing to do with that. Zack has always been one of my favourite characters. So, was Kendall. I stopped liking Kendall because she went way too far when it came to Reese. It's like,"You either love Zack or you don't." Then Zack got annoying when he did the SAME THING to Kendall, he just went to far. Not to mention he KILLED Kendall's BROTHER. And he locked her up and refuse to talk to her. He treated her like, you know. The way he just kept torturing Kendall because of Ryan was so annoying. Plus, he has too much power in soapland. He killed Kendall's brother, he shot at Jonathan (Ryan's brother), he tortured Greenlee when she got back, which he didn't even know her, as I remember. Now, he's got Jesse being his lackey. Setting Annie up to make it look like she shot Adam. I just HATE how his character has too much power. Sometimes I think he's way more manipulative and gets away with a LOT more than both Annie and David put together. AT THE VERY LEAST, EVERYBODY HATES Annie and David. Zack is equally as bad, maybe worst and everybody loves him, (except Annie, of course). ____________________________________ About Amanda, she SHOULD HAVE went to the judges in the FIRST PLACE. David signed papers saying he wouldn't take Trevor because of Krystal. Amanda should have used that, INSTEAD OF faking her baby's death. WHY didn't she do that in the FIRST PLACE??? Instead of coming up with this STUPID, "let's fake my baby's death" scheme, she should have went to the judges IN THE FIRST PLACE, let them know that David didn't want custody and threaten to take her child away, and is a single person. David may have judges in his pockets, but so does JR and JR did tell her that he would be willing to help. She should have fought the right way in the first place. And NOTHING is more painful for a parent than hearing that their child is dead. I wasn't around when Babe did it. I haven't been watching this show for that long. But leading people to believe their baby is dead is MONSTROUS. And it's like what the DA said,"Because she broke COUNTLESS LAWS, faking her baby's death, she should take whatever deal David gives her." This could have all been PREVENTED if she did things the right way and let a judge know that David threatened to kidnap her baby, that he harassed her countless times, and that he signed papers releasing him of custody. It is her own fault that she's in this mess. And I am totally against anybody faking a baby's death, EVEN IF IT IS DAVID. It is WRONG and SICKENING that she could do such a horrible, monstrous, nasty thing. I don't hate Amanda, I actually really like her character. I blame this more on Jake than Amanda. This is why I wish that Amanda and JR would stay together, they fit together. JR and Amanda had chemistry, to me anyway. Amanda is spineless, but JR has plenty of spine. I am sure that if she and JR stayed together, David wouldn't have been an issue. Because when it comes to the Chandlers vs. David. The Chandlers ALWAYS win against David. |
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.